Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "54f".
Did you mean:
54
2017 Jun 30
1
Intermittent AcceptSecurityContext 54f response to LDAP bind
Hello,
I'm on Samba 4.6.3. I'm seeing intermittent error 54f response to LDAP
binds on 1 of 4 DCs. I wrote a script to test the DCs:
https://pastebin.com/egsY3W9H, which produced these results:
https://pastebin.com/6UsvwVgX. I'm not seeing any errors in the samba log.
Thanks,
Arthur
This e-mail and any attachments may contain CONFIDENTIAL inform...
2017 Apr 05
0
Key table name malformed
...,
> just the keytab is not generated.
>
> And (probably as a result of that?) I cannot logon (ssh or console) as
> an AD domain user:
>
> > Apr 4 19:57:01 processing sshd[1159]: pam_unix(sshd:auth):
> authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser=
> rhost=54f.fth.concepts.com user=username
> > Apr 4 19:57:01 processing sshd[1159]: pam_winbind(sshd:auth): getting
> password (0x00000388)
> > Apr 4 19:57:01 processing sshd[1159]: pam_winbind(sshd:auth):
> pam_get_item returned a password
> > Apr 4 19:57:02 processing sshd[1159]:...
2017 Apr 04
4
Key table name malformed
Hi,
We are having an issue, trying to install a domain member server.
I'm following the samba wiki:
- samba 4.6.1
- krb5.conf as recommended on wiki
- time synced
- kinit works
- dns works (DCs in resolv.conf)
- setup a basic smb.conf (pasted at the end of this email)
- edit nsswitch.conf to include winbind for passwd/group
and then finally "net ads join -U administrator -d5" fails
2007 Apr 30
0
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
...1 <__FUNCTION__.22845+0x1>
> 545: 61 popa
> - 546: 70 70 jo 5b8 <__FUNCTION__.22936+0x8>
> + 546: 70 70 jo 5b8 <__FUNCTION__.22845+0x8>
> 548: 69 6e 67 5f 74 72 65 imul $0x6572745f,0x67(%esi),%ebp
> 54f: 65 gs
> - 550: 73 5f jae 5b1 <__FUNCTION__.22936+0x1>
> - 552: 70 00 jo 554 <__FUNCTION__.22434>
> + 550: 73 5f jae 5b1 <__FUNCTION__.22845+0x1>
> + 552: 70 00 jo 554 <...
2007 Apr 27
2
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
The saga continues.
I've been tracking the interface changes and merging them with
the refactoring work I'm doing. I got as far as building stage3
of llvm-gcc but the object files from stage2 and stage3 differ:
warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs
warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs
(Are the above two ok?)
The list below is clearly bad. I think it's every object file in
the
2008 May 21
0
Errors in using gdb (PR#11496)
...Vs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...