Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "549981b8".
2013 Nov 09
0
[LLVMdev] Proposal for safe-to-execute meta-data for heap accesses
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Filip Pizlo <fpizlo at apple.com> wrote:
> Is the expectation that to utilize this metadata an optimization pass
> would have to inspect the body of @f and reason about its behavior given
> <args>?
>
>
> Yes.
>
>
> If so, then I think this is pretty bad. If we ever want to parallelize
> function passes, then they can't
2013 Nov 09
1
[LLVMdev] Proposal for safe-to-execute meta-data for heap accesses
...keep thinking about this though and see if I can contribute a more positive comment. =]
Fair enough! I look forward to hearing more feedback.
-Filip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131108/549981b8/attachment.html>
2013 Nov 08
5
[LLVMdev] Proposal for safe-to-execute meta-data for heap accesses
> On Nov 8, 2013, at 1:13 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Filip Pizlo <fpizlo at apple.com> wrote:
>> NEW PROPOSAL
>>
>> The solution is to introduce meta-data that is explicit about how the safe-to-execute condition ought to be evaluated. Instead of an SSA use, we can have meta-data that