Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "546ff".
Did you mean:
546f
2018 Jan 04
3
silent recycling in logical indexing
...nstead we do get a warning:
> x | y
[1] TRUE TRUE TRUE
Warning message:
In x | y : longer object length is not a multiple of shorter object length
Is it just too expensive to test for incomplete recycling when doing
subsetting, or is there a sensible use case for incomplete recycling?
Ll. 546ff of main/src/subscript.c suggest that there is a place in the
code where we already know if incomplete recycling has happened ...
Thoughts?
cheers
Ben Bolker