Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "546820".
Did you mean:
54680
2003 Jul 14
2
Rebuilding rsync to define HAVE_OFFSET64_T
HI,
I'm currently using rsync version 2.4.4 protocol version 24 on a HP11.0, Solaris 8 and Redhat 7.1 platforms. In my earlier posting, I asked about the problem on "Value too large to be stored in data type" when transferring files which are >= 2GB in size., i.e.
building file list ... global/FCSI/WP_RLS05/rundir/wp_celtic_max_fullwarn.tcl.log: Value too large to be stored in