search for: 53f97636

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "53f97636".

2013 Nov 26
0
[LLVMdev] Finding the first line number of a function (-g vs -gline-tables-only)
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 7:47 AM, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google.com> wrote: > For the sample profiler, I need to determine the location of the first > user instruction in the function. This can be the LOC where the > function header is or the LOC of the actual first instruction, it > doesn't really matter. Actually, I lied. It turns out that it DOES matter. I need the
2013 Nov 26
1
[LLVMdev] Finding the first line number of a function (-g vs -gline-tables-only)
...ue, i32 0, i32 0, null, i32 256, i1 false, i32 ()* @main, null, null, metadata !2, i32 6} ; [ DW_TAG_subprogram ] [line 6] [def] [main] cheers, --renato -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131126/53f97636/attachment.html>
2013 Nov 26
3
[LLVMdev] Finding the first line number of a function (-g vs -gline-tables-only)
For the sample profiler, I need to determine the location of the first user instruction in the function. This can be the LOC where the function header is or the LOC of the actual first instruction, it doesn't really matter. But it needs to be consistent wrt -g and -gline-tables-only. Currently, I'm scanning for the first non-zero line number from the top of the function. This skips over