search for: 53972

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "53972".

Did you mean: 5397
2013 Jun 17
5
Filesystem "somewhat" destroyed - need help for recovery/fixing
...had to remove power... When I try to mount my filesystem (there''s only one, with a few subfilesystems), the system crashes. Also btrfsck dies; always like this: a@ask-home:~$ sudo /btrfs-progs.dev/bin/btrfsck /dev/ssd/Data parent transid verify failed on 33327525888 wanted 53973 found 53972 parent transid verify failed on 33327525888 wanted 53973 found 53972 Ignoring transid failure Checking filesystem on /dev/ssd/Data UUID: 7d2eb10f-aced-4d41-bb7f-7badbf075b6a checking extents checking fs roots root 325 inode 31590 errors 400 extent buffer leak: start 33327525888 len 4096 *** Error i...
2013 Dec 23
2
[PATCH net-next 3/3] net: auto-tune mergeable rx buffer size for improved performance
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 04:16:29PM -0800, Michael Dalton wrote: > Commit 2613af0ed18a ("virtio_net: migrate mergeable rx buffers to page frag > allocators") changed the mergeable receive buffer size from PAGE_SIZE to > MTU-size, introducing a single-stream regression for benchmarks with large > average packet size. There is no single optimal buffer size for all >
2013 Dec 23
2
[PATCH net-next 3/3] net: auto-tune mergeable rx buffer size for improved performance
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 04:16:29PM -0800, Michael Dalton wrote: > Commit 2613af0ed18a ("virtio_net: migrate mergeable rx buffers to page frag > allocators") changed the mergeable receive buffer size from PAGE_SIZE to > MTU-size, introducing a single-stream regression for benchmarks with large > average packet size. There is no single optimal buffer size for all >