Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "538f8d1".
Did you mean:
53881
2015 Dec 30
2
[PATCH 08/34] asm-generic: smp_store_mb should use smp_mb
...uses it as such by mistake.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
> ---
> include/asm-generic/barrier.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/barrier.h b/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
> index 538f8d1..987b2e0 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@
> #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
>
> #ifndef smp_store_mb
> -#define smp_store_mb(var, value) do { WRITE_ONCE(var, value); mb(); } while (0)
> +#define smp_store_mb(...
2015 Dec 30
2
[PATCH 08/34] asm-generic: smp_store_mb should use smp_mb
...uses it as such by mistake.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
> ---
> include/asm-generic/barrier.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/barrier.h b/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
> index 538f8d1..987b2e0 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@
> #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
>
> #ifndef smp_store_mb
> -#define smp_store_mb(var, value) do { WRITE_ONCE(var, value); mb(); } while (0)
> +#define smp_store_mb(...
2015 Dec 30
0
[PATCH 08/34] asm-generic: smp_store_mb should use smp_mb
...istently before some arch-specific
code uses it as such by mistake.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
---
include/asm-generic/barrier.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/barrier.h b/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
index 538f8d1..987b2e0 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
#ifndef smp_store_mb
-#define smp_store_mb(var, value) do { WRITE_ONCE(var, value); mb(); } while (0)
+#define smp_store_mb(var, value) do { WRITE_ONCE(var, value)...
2015 Dec 30
0
[PATCH 08/34] asm-generic: smp_store_mb should use smp_mb
...gt; > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
> > ---
> > include/asm-generic/barrier.h | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/barrier.h b/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
> > index 538f8d1..987b2e0 100644
> > --- a/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
> > +++ b/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
> > @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@
> > #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
> >
> > #ifndef smp_store_mb
> > -#define smp_store_mb(var, value) do { WRITE_ONCE(var, value); mb(); } wh...
2015 Dec 30
46
[PATCH 00/34] arch: barrier cleanup + __smp_XXX barriers for virt
This is really trying to cleanup some virt code, as suggested by Peter, who
said
> You could of course go fix that instead of mutilating things into
> sort-of functional state.
This work is needed for virtio, so it's probably easiest to
merge it through my tree - is this fine by everyone?
Arnd, if you agree, could you ack this please?
Note to arch maintainers: please don't
2015 Dec 30
46
[PATCH 00/34] arch: barrier cleanup + __smp_XXX barriers for virt
This is really trying to cleanup some virt code, as suggested by Peter, who
said
> You could of course go fix that instead of mutilating things into
> sort-of functional state.
This work is needed for virtio, so it's probably easiest to
merge it through my tree - is this fine by everyone?
Arnd, if you agree, could you ack this please?
Note to arch maintainers: please don't