Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "534bfde7".
Did you mean:
5340fd7
2012 Dec 30
0
[LLVMdev] Extending GC infrastructure for roots in SSA values
...d pointers are fat pointers, so they should
> not be represented as PointerType in the IR or as iPTR in the back end.
>
> David
--
-- Talin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20121230/534bfde7/attachment.html>
2012 Dec 30
2
[LLVMdev] Extending GC infrastructure for roots in SSA values
On 30 Dec 2012, at 01:54, Talin wrote:
> I completely agree with your point about wanting to be able to attach GC metadata to a type (rather than attaching it to a value, as is done now). In the past, there have been two objections to this approach: first, the overhead that would be added to the Pointer type - the vast majority of LLVM users don't want to have to pay an extra 4-8 bytes per