Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "52e3b517".
2013 Jun 05
0
[LLVMdev] Enabling the vectorizer for -Os
..., in a nutshell, I agree that -Os could have the vectorizer enabled by
default, but I'm yet to see a good reason to do that on -O2.
cheers,
--renato
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130605/52e3b517/attachment.html>
2013 Jun 05
15
[LLVMdev] Enabling the vectorizer for -Os
Hi,
I would like to start a discussion about enabling the loop vectorizer by default for -Os. The loop vectorizer can accelerate many workloads and enabling it for -Os and -O2 has obvious performance benefits. At the same time the loop vectorizer can increase the code size because of two reasons. First, to vectorize some loops we have to keep the original loop around in order to handle the last