Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "52cf00ec".
Did you mean:
2cf00ec4
2016 Mar 09
2
Status of the official LLVM APT repositories
On Wed, 9 Mar 2016, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> This is still maintained. However the cmake transition (for both 3.8 and
> 3.9) wasn't simple... While it should be fine for debian, it might need
> more work for old Ubuntu (back port of cmake)
Hi Sylvestre,
Thank you for the clarification! Any ETAs on when the APT repositories are
going to be updated with LLVM 3.8 & 3.9 builds?
2016 Mar 12
4
Status of the official LLVM APT repositories
...n 257166), but LLVM 3.9 is not [1].
Best regards,
Johan Engelen
[1] Tested 7 days ago,
https://github.com/travis-ci/apt-package-whitelist/issues/2671
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160312/52cf00ec/attachment.html>