Displaying 20 results from an estimated 90 matches for "5213".
Did you mean:
213
2004 May 23
1
IAX2 REACHABLE/UNREACHABLE
...ection for troubleshooting, I would
appreciate it. I am pasting example error messages that I receive below.
TIA,
John
CLI Output:
May 23 12:50:05 NOTICE[7176]: chan_iax2.c:5616 iax2_poke_noanswer: Peer
'arlington' is now UNREACHABLE!
May 23 12:50:15 NOTICE[7176]: chan_iax2.c:5213 socket_read: Peer 'arlington'
is now REACHABLE!
May 23 12:58:19 NOTICE[7176]: chan_iax2.c:5616 iax2_poke_noanswer: Peer
'arlington' is now UNREACHABLE!
May 23 12:58:29 NOTICE[7176]: chan_iax2.c:5213 socket_read: Peer 'arlington'
is now REACHABLE!
May 23 13:06:07 NOTICE[5126]...
2003 Nov 20
1
glm inconsistent behaviour (PR#5213)
Full_Name: Finn Knudsen
Version: 1.8.0
OS: windows 2000
Submission from: (NULL) (194.192.22.33)
The problem seems to happen when running the GLM. When both multiplicative
effects and an offset is present. I experienced this problem on my own dataset
when using af Poisson familiy with log link function but the behaviour can be
reproduced with the following code.
I do not know if it is a bug, but
2019 Sep 27
2
Security AccountID unknown - PJSIP
..."Informational",Servic
e="PJSIP",EventVersion="1",AccountID="<unknown>",
SessionID="56b0ca9-d967a90d16411209-a1b0fae1 at 188.165.222.17",LocalAddress="IPV4/UDP/<MyAddress>/5060",
RemoteAddress="IPV4/UDP/<attackerIP>/5213",Challenge=""
We have a lot of such tries coming from IPs not allowed and fail2ban
fail to ban them because of SecurityEvent not treated and Severity
Informational.
We add a fail2ban filter to ban those IPs which is OK on our side but
also means that attacker knows that account...
2018 Feb 09
2
retpoline mitigation and 6.0
...on, and why compilation fails for those and not "r" which
blatantly can't take a 'long long' *either* but Clang seems to cope
with that one.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5213 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180209/860e866e/attachment.bin>
2019 Sep 30
2
Security AccountID unknown - PJSIP
...Servic
>> e="PJSIP",EventVersion="1",AccountID="<unknown>",
>> SessionID="56b0ca9-d967a90d16411209-a1b0fae1 at 188.165.222.17",LocalAddress="IPV4/UDP/<MyAddress>/5060",
>> RemoteAddress="IPV4/UDP/<attackerIP>/5213",Challenge=""
>>
>> We have a lot of such tries coming from IPs not allowed and fail2ban
>> fail to ban them because of SecurityEvent not treated and Severity
>> Informational.
>>
>> We add a fail2ban filter to ban those IPs which is OK on our side...
2018 Feb 09
0
retpoline mitigation and 6.0
...#39;m just going to attempt to work around it like this in the
kernel, so I can concentrate on the retpoline bits:
http://david.woodhou.se/clang-percpu-hack.patch
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5213 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180209/c21ee665/attachment-0001.bin>
2018 Feb 09
0
retpoline mitigation and 6.0
...oes away if I compile io_apic.c without
retpoline", bisecting it per-function would help to further delay the
bit where I actually have to start *thinking*...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5213 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180209/fbcb1814/attachment.bin>
2018 Feb 07
2
retpoline mitigation and 6.0
...should go to llvm-commits as a proper review. Do you want to do
> that David? Want someone on our end to pick it up?
I'll attempt to add some test cases...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5213 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180207/e0581a56/attachment.bin>
2015 Feb 06
0
[PATCH] x86 spinlock: Fix memory corruption on completing completions
...oracle.com>
> Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds at linux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
With this patch, my VMs lock up quickly after boot with:
[ 161.613469] BUG: spinlock lockup suspected on CPU#31, kworker/31:1/5213
[ 161.613469] lock: purge_lock.28981+0x0/0x40, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: kworker/7:1/6400, .owner_cpu: 7
[ 161.613469] CPU: 31 PID: 5213 Comm: kworker/31:1 Not tainted 3.19.0-rc7-next-20150204-sasha-00048-gee3a350 #1869
[ 161.613469] Workqueue: events bpf_prog_free_deferred
[ 161.613469] 0000...
2015 Feb 06
0
[PATCH] x86 spinlock: Fix memory corruption on completing completions
...oracle.com>
> Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds at linux-foundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
With this patch, my VMs lock up quickly after boot with:
[ 161.613469] BUG: spinlock lockup suspected on CPU#31, kworker/31:1/5213
[ 161.613469] lock: purge_lock.28981+0x0/0x40, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: kworker/7:1/6400, .owner_cpu: 7
[ 161.613469] CPU: 31 PID: 5213 Comm: kworker/31:1 Not tainted 3.19.0-rc7-next-20150204-sasha-00048-gee3a350 #1869
[ 161.613469] Workqueue: events bpf_prog_free_deferred
[ 161.613469] 0000...
2018 Feb 08
2
retpoline mitigation and 6.0
...ier(i32* %p) {
entry:
tail call void asm sideeffect "call __x86_indirect_thunk_${0:V}", "r,~{dirflag},~{fpsr},~{flags}"(i32* %p)
ret void
}
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5213 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180208/0f3de7de/attachment.bin>
2018 Feb 08
2
retpoline mitigation and 6.0
...It's a slight performance optimisation,
that none of the init code in the kernel itself actually has to be
built with retpolines. But it isn't imperative.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5213 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180208/b261459d/attachment.bin>
2018 Feb 07
2
retpoline mitigation and 6.0
...--- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180207/a44dbf7b/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5213 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180207/a44dbf7b/attachment.bin>
2004 Jul 29
2
Samba 3.0.x and high processor utilication caused by /etc/passwd access
...als PDC with SMBPASSWD Authentification (no windbind, kerberos,
ldap..)
TOP shows the following
################################################################
PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND
19094 nobody 18 0 3872 3872 3440 R 8.7 0.7 43:22 smbd
5213 nobody 18 0 3784 3784 3400 R 8.7 0.7 29:43 smbd
9345 nobody 17 0 4100 4100 3628 R 8.7 0.7 29:24 smbd
10237 nobody 19 0 3772 3772 3400 R 8.7 0.7 29:06 smbd
17121 nobody 17 0 4140 4140 3632 R 8.7 0.8 28:02 smbd
20776 nobody 18 0 3668 3668 33...
2018 Feb 09
2
retpoline mitigation and 6.0
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:26 AM David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 2018-02-09 at 02:21 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Fri, 2018-02-09 at 01:18 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > For now I'm just going to attempt to work around it like this in the
> > > kernel, so I can concentrate on the
2018 Feb 09
2
retpoline mitigation and 6.0
...t does. I'm rebuilding a Release build of
llvm/clang so that experimental kernel builds hopefully take less than
an hour, and will prod further in the morning.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5213 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180209/bf3fe0ad/attachment.bin>
2018 Feb 07
0
retpoline mitigation and 6.0
...6_indirect_thunk.
The former... wtf? Can you show me the code that actually *calls* that.
I am having difficulty imagining any situation in which that's sane.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5213 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180207/9a7ad1d3/attachment.bin>
2018 Feb 07
4
retpoline mitigation and 6.0
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 2:56 PM David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-02-06 at 22:08 +0000, Chandler Carruth wrote:
>
> So, I was waiting to hear a definitive response on whether using aliases
> is hard, and didn't see one here, which is why I haven't responded further.
>
> However, a colleauge pointed me at an LKML thread where it seems
2018 Feb 03
0
retpoline mitigation and 6.0
...en you're doing it inline or in a
COMDAT section. It's *only* the external thunk where it absolutely
*does* become an ABI, where we care about consistency.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5213 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180203/3c4c4877/attachment.bin>
2018 Feb 07
2
retpoline mitigation and 6.0
Quick response to a detail, I'll respond to more of this when i have more
time.
On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 1:55 PM David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org> wrote:
> OK... which __x86_indirect_thunk* symbols *are* being used by Clang in
> 32-bit mode?
__x86_indirect_thunk
__x86_indirect_thunk_eax
__x86_indirect_thunk_ecx
__x86_indirect_thunk_edx
> I've added