Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "51b409a2".
Did you mean:
514092
2012 May 09
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH][RFC] Add llvm.codegen Intrinsic To Support Embedded LLVM IR Code Generation
Hi Evan,
Thanks for your time.
You're adding a feature that embed code inside a module. When the module is
> loaded, is the string going to be verified? How are users of LLVM IR able
> to ensure the embedded string is safe? I am not saying it cannot be done.
> This feature just increases the risk and that again raises the bar for
> acceptance.
>
I think the embedded string in
2012 May 08
4
[LLVMdev] [PATCH][RFC] Add llvm.codegen Intrinsic To Support Embedded LLVM IR Code Generation
On May 8, 2012, at 2:08 AM, Tobias Grosser wrote:
> On 05/08/2012 05:13 AM, Evan Cheng wrote:
>> Sorry Tobias, I'm not in favor of this change. From what I can tell, this enables some features which can implemented via other means. It adds all kinds of complexity to LLVM and I'm also highly concerned about bitcode that can embed illegal (or worse malicious) code using this