search for: 515c238d

Does not load. Wondering if this should work or has been moved ? Thanks, Anand -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

...ead of hardcoded ''make'' Shawn Bohrer (1): btrfs-progs: Update resize documentation Wang Sheng-Hui (1): btrfs-progs: cleanup: remove the redundant BTRFS_CSUM_TYPE_CRC32 macro def -- === Hugo Mills: hugo@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk === PGP key: 515C238D from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk --- Great oxymorons of the world, no. 5: Manifesto Promise ---

...Interestingly, the metadata value was closer to 15K/object until my last batch of writing, which was the 171 1G+ files (and a few in the 100M-1G range), plus an equal number of small (<2K) files. Hugo. -- === Hugo Mills: hugo@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk === PGP key: 515C238D from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk --- Trouble rather the tiger in his lair than the sage amongst --- his books for to you kingdoms and their armies are mighty and enduring, but to him they are but toys of the moment to be overt...

Hi, I wanted to create a new btrfs fs for my backups. When trying to mkfs.btrfs for that device, I''m getting "error checking /dev/loop2 mount status" With strace I see where the problem is: lstat("/dev/disk/by-id/ata-INTEL_SSDSA2M160G2GC_CVPO939201JX160AGN-par", 0x7fffa30b3cf0) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) The problem is there is something missing

I came across the tidbit that ZFS has a contract guarantee that the data read back will either be correct (the checksum computed over the data read from the disk matches the checksum stored on disk), or you get an I/O error. Obviously, this greatly reduces the probability that the data is invalid. (Particularly when taken in combination with the disk firmware''s own ECC and checksumming.)

Hi, my btrfs "hangs" when doing a balance operation. I''m using a 3.7.1 kernel from opensuse: linux-opzz 3.7.1-2.10-m4 #11 SMP PREEMPT Fri Jan 11 18:04:04 CET 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux and Btrfs v0.19+ I did a scrub which completed without errors. Then I tried "btrfs filesystem balance /" which work fine for the first 23 of 46 chunks, then ist stopped

I have been experimenting exporting btrfs subvolumes over nfs. Main subvolume is filesys1 mounted at /filesys1. Below this is subvolume base, user1 is in base and documents is in user1. documents is mounted at /documents. /etc/exports is: /filesys1/base/user1 172.16.0.0/24(rw,no_acl,no_root_squash,fsid=0) /filesys1/user1-snapshot 172.16.0.0/24(rw,no_acl,no_root_squash,fsid=0)

Hi, I reported a bug to anaconda (rhbz 901905), but it might be btfs related. Anaconda does this: 18:49:10,317 INFO program: Running... mkfs.btrfs --data=single --label=fedora /dev/vdb1 /dev/vdc1 /dev/vdd1 /dev/vde1 18:49:10,742 INFO program: 18:49:10,746 INFO program: WARNING! - Btrfs Btrfs v0.19 IS EXPERIMENTAL 18:49:10,746 INFO program: WARNING! - see http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org before

...rub userland implementation scrub added to manpage WuBo (1): Btrfs-progs: Add chunk tree recover tool Zhong, Xin (1): btrfs-progs: Improvement for making btrfs image from source directory. -- === Hugo Mills: hugo@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk === PGP key: 515C238D from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk --- Nothing wrong with being written in Perl... Some of my best --- friends are written in Perl.

Hi, the situation: Label: ''RootFS''  uuid: c87975a0-a575-405e-9890-d3f7f25bbd96     Total devices 2 FS bytes used 284.98GB     devid    2 size 311.82GB used 286.51GB path /dev/sdb3     devid    1 size 897.76GB used 286.51GB path /dev/sda3 RootFS created when sda3 was 897.76GB and sdb3 311.82GB. I have now freed other space on sdb. So I deleted sdb3 and recreated it occupying all

Hey, I''d start by saying that I know Btrfs is a still experimental, and so there''s no guarantee that one would be able to help me at all... But I thought I''ll try anyway :-) Few months ago I bought a new laptop and installed ArchLinux on it, with Btrfs on the root filesystem... I know, it''s not the smartest thing to do... After a few month I had issues with my

Greetings, until yesterday I was running a btrfs filesystem across two 2.0 TiB disks in RAID1 mode for both metadata and data without any problems. As space was getting short I wanted to extend the filesystem by two additional drives lying around, which both are 1.0 TiB in size. Knowing little about the btrfs RAID implementation I thought I had to switch to RAID10 mode, which I was told is

Hi, This left me puzzled for a while: 22:29 borg:/ # losetup /dev/loop1 /.B.disk 22:29 borg:/ # mount /dev/loop1 /B mount: /dev/loop1: can''t read superblock 22:29 borg:/ # blkid /dev/loop1 /dev/loop1: UUID="e19fe89b-cde3-4ccc-bc70-b759a57bd1c9" UUID_SUB="f29c6218-d040-4546-a227-4dd2d2142817" TYPE="btrfs" 22:29 borg:/ # losetup -d /dev/loop1 22:29 borg:/ #

Hallo, linux-btrfs, I can''t switch a running "btrfs filesystem balance ..." via ctrl z bg into the background, with other jobs this way works. The stopping command "ctrl z" doesn''t work. (may be on other keyboards it''s "ctrl y") What goes wrong? Viele Gruesse! Helmut -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Hello! I have a 1 TB ext4 drive that''s quite full (~50 GB free space, though I could free up another 100 GB or so if necessary) and two empty 0.5 TB drives. Is it possible to get another 1 TB drive and combine the four drives to a btrfs raid10 setup without (if all goes well) losing my data? Regards, Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Hello World! I''ve just done a git pull from git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs-unstable.git and looking at git log, the last commit was on Wed Oct 6 09:53:38 2010, nearly a year ago. Is this project still maintained? Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Is it ( yet? ) possible to manipulate the allocation policy on a subvolume level instead of the fs level? For example, to make / use raid1, and /home use raid0? Or to have / allocated from an ssd and /home allocated from the giant 2tb hd. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -

I was looking through some of the archives and notice a patch submitted to implement: btrfs subvolume show <path-to-subvolume> command. I also noticed that is does not appear to be in the git. This looks like a useful capability. I was trying to find out what the UUID was for a newly created subvolume and have not found out how to do that. Gene -- To unsubscribe from this

Hi everyone, I''ve updated the master branch with the pending stable btrfs-progs commit that should make the 0.20 release. Thanks to Hugh for helping to queue up a few of them. We''ll have more frequent releases from here as we pull in the major new features going into progs (raid5/6, send/receive, quotas, fsck improvements). Please give it a shot and let me know if you see any

Is there a way to mix RAID 1 and 0 in different subvolumes? I am a new user to btrfs and would like to protect the important files with mirroring, but have a bulk area that is striped for speed and size. For example I want / and /home to be mirrored, but /media can just be striped as it is all data I can easily recreate. I see an item in the Project_ideas wiki entry called "Online raid