search for: 512kb

...protections[]: 0 0 0 Dec 3 15:47:06 HOST1 kernel: Normal free:3704kB min:3728kB low:7456kB high:11184kB active:2688kB inactive:2284kB present:901120kB pages_scanned:6237 all_unreclaimable? yes Dec 3 15:47:06 HOST1 kernel: protections[]: 0 0 0 Dec 3 15:47:06 HOST1 kernel: HighMem free:1664kB min:512kB low:1024kB high:1536kB active:29852572kB inactive:2621716kB present:33423360kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no Dec 3 15:47:06 HOST1 kernel: protections[]: 0 0 0 Dec 3 15:47:06 HOST1 kernel: DMA: 2*4kB 5*8kB 3*16kB 2*32kB 4*64kB 2*128kB 2*256kB 0*512kB 1*1024kB 1*2048kB 2*4096kB = 12448kB D...

...) Dec 7 19:52:43 gcclo77 kernel: aa:0 ac:0 id:0 il:0 ic:0 fr:2927 Dec 7 19:52:43 gcclo77 kernel: aa:157445 ac:1554 id:301 il:0 ic:0 fr:737 Dec 7 19:52:43 gcclo77 kernel: aa:2791 ac:569 id:1 il:0 ic:0 fr:126 Dec 7 19:52:43 gcclo77 kernel: 3*4kB 2*8kB 4*16kB 3*32kB 4*64kB 2*128kB 1*256kB 1*512kB 0*1024kB 1*2048kB 2*4096kB = 11708kB) Dec 7 19:52:43 gcclo77 kernel: 49*4kB 0*8kB 0*16kB 0*32kB 1*64kB 1*128kB 0*256kB 1*512kB 0*1024kB 1*2048kB 0*4096kB = 2948kB) Dec 7 19:52:43 gcclo77 kernel: 0*4kB 1*8kB 1*16kB 1*32kB 1*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 504kB) Dec 7...

...nel: protections[]: 0 0 0 Aug 30 15:46:20 crmdb kernel: Normal free:896kB min:928kB low:1856kB high:2784kB active:736kB ina ctive:208kB present:901120kB pages_scanned:1889 all_unreclaimable? yes Aug 30 15:46:20 crmdb kernel: protections[]: 0 0 0 Aug 30 15:46:20 crmdb kernel: HighMem free:2560kB min:512kB low:1024kB high:1536kB active:5735060 kB inactive:161244kB present:8257532kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no Aug 30 15:46:20 crmdb kernel: protections[]: 0 0 0 Aug 30 15:46:20 crmdb kernel: DMA: 2*4kB 5*8kB 3*16kB 3*32kB 3*64kB 3*128kB 2*256kB 0*512kB 1*102 4kB 1*2048kB 2*4096kB = 12544kB Aug...

...e:0kB present:16384kB May 31 22:31:26 tcs kernel: protections[]: 0 0 0 May 31 22:31:26 tcs kernel: Normal free:896kB min:936kB low:1872kB high:2808kB active:240kB inactive:416kB present:901120kB May 31 22:31:26 tcs kernel: protections[]: 0 0 0 May 31 22:31:26 tcs kernel: HighMem free:3578432kB min:512kB low:1024kB high:1536kB active:387344kB inactive:81508kB present:4325372 kB May 31 22:31:26 tcs kernel: protections[]: 0 0 0 May 31 22:31:26 tcs kernel: DMA: 0*4kB 0*8kB 1*16kB 0*32kB 0*64kB 0*128kB 0*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 16kB May 31 22:31:26 tcs kernel: Normal: 0*4kB 0*8kB 2...

...:2MB- -400 40GB£¨ 536DX/É¢£©5400ת\»º´æ:2MB- -250 15GB£¨531DX/É¢£©5400ת\»º´æ:2MB- -230 20GB£¨Plus 60/ºÐ£©7200ת\»º´æ:2MB--250 Ï£½Ý 40.8GB£¨U Series 6£©5400ת\»º´æ:2MB--220 40GB£¨Barracuda ATA IV£©7200ת\»º´æ:2MB--250 60GB£¨Barracuda ATA IV£©7200ת\»º´æ:2MB--300 20.4GB£¨U Series 6£©5400ת\»º´æ:512KB--210 80GB£¨Barracuda ATA IV£©7200ת\»º´æ:2MB--380 20GB£¨Barracuda ATA IV£©7200ת\»º´æ:2MB--230 30GB£¨Barracuda ATA III£©7200ת\»º´æ:2MB--250 20GB£¨U Series 5£©5400ת\»º´æ:512KB--190 40GB£¨U Series 5£©5400ת\»º´æ:512KB--240 20GB£¨Barracuda ATA III£©7200ת\»º´æ:2MB--240 40GB£¨Barracuda ATA III£©7...

Interesting flash technology overview and SSD review here: http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/intel/showdoc.aspx?i=3403 and another review here: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/Intel-x25-m-SSD,2012.html Regards, -- Al Hopper Logical Approach Inc,Plano,TX al at logical-approach.com Voice: 972.379.2133 Timezone: US CDT OpenSolaris Governing Board (OGB) Member - Apr 2005

...2MB- -400 40GB£¨ 536DX/É¢£©5400ת\»º´æ:2MB- -250 15GB£¨531DX/É¢£©5400ת\»º´æ:2MB- -230 20GB£¨Plus 60/ºÐ£©7200ת\»º´æ:2MB--250 Ï£½Ý 40.8GB£¨U Series 6£©5400ת\»º´æ:2MB--220 40GB£¨Barracuda ATA IV£©7200ת\»º´æ:2MB--250 60GB£¨Barracuda ATA IV£©7200ת\»º´æ:2MB--300 20.4GB£¨U Series 6£©5400ת\»º´æ:512KB--210 80GB£¨Barracuda ATA IV£©7200ת\»º´æ:2MB--380 20GB£¨Barracuda ATA IV£©7200ת\»º´æ:2MB--230 30GB£¨Barracuda ATA III£©7200ת\»º´æ:2MB--250 20GB£¨U Series 5£©5400ת\»º´æ:512KB--190 40GB£¨U Series 5£©5400ת\»º´æ:512KB--240 20GB£¨Barracuda ATA III£©7200ת\»º´æ:2MB--240 40GB£¨Barracuda ATA III£©7...

...8:23 server1 kernel: HighMem free:49280kB min:128kB low:256kB high:384kB active:21460kB inactive:25216kB present:98240kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no Feb 4 00:08:23 server1 kernel: protections[]: 0 0 0 Feb 4 00:08:23 server1 kernel: DMA: 0*4kB 0*8kB 0*16kB 0*32kB 0*64kB 0*128kB 0*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 0kB Feb 4 00:08:23 server1 kernel: Normal: 0*4kB 0*8kB 0*16kB 0*32kB 0*64kB 0*128kB 0*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 0kB Feb 4 00:08:23 server1 kernel: HighMem: 1614*4kB 1807*8kB 1105*16kB 290*32kB 20*64kB 1*128kB 0*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB...

...ocked:0kB dirty:0kB writeback:0kB mapped:0kB shmem:0kB slab_reclaimable:0kB slab_unreclaimable:0kB kernel_stack:0kB pagetables:0kB unstable:0kB bounce:0kB writeback_tmp:0kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0 Node 0 DMA: 2*4kB 0*8kB 2*16kB 2*32kB 4*64kB 2*128kB 2*256kB 1*512kB 1*1024kB 1*2048kB 2*4096kB = 12904kB Node 0 DMA32: 1*4kB 1*8kB 2*16kB 0*32kB 1*64kB 3*128kB 1*256kB 2*512kB 2*1024kB 2*2048kB 272*4096kB = 1122028kB Node 0 Normal: 0*4kB 0*8kB 0*16kB 0*32kB 0*64kB 0*128kB 0*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 0kB 62219 total pagecache pages 0 pages in swap c...

I have a link to a building (e.g. 10Mb/s) and want to split up the bandwidth to different users. Each user should get e.g., 512kB/s plus 256kB/s dedicated for VoIP. What kind of device can I use for that ? (managing switch ??? which one?) bye Ronald Wiplinger

Hi all, Just watching for my first time the 'oom-killer' call in a CentOS 4.2 workstation. System was running normally but with high load of nice process, iow, rosetta and seti, others appart, nautilus, etc... i realized that after a night of standby running normally, the next moorning after few manual operations from X-session in local console, it started a massive swapping, this time

...able:746356kB slab_unreclaimable:38924kB kernel_stack:5728kB pagetables:20060kB unstable:0kB bounce:0kB free_pcp:120kB local_pcp:0kB free_cma:0kB writeback_tmp:0kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0 DMA: 0*4kB 0*8kB 1*16kB (U) 0*32kB 2*64kB (U) 1*128kB (U) 1*256kB (U) 0*512kB 1*1024kB (U) 1*2048kB (U) 3*4096kB (M) = 15888kB DMA32: 1691*4kB (UME) 2651*8kB (UME) 50*16kB (UME) 9*32kB (ME) 7*64kB (E) 0*128kB 0*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 29508kB Normal: 2315*4kB (UME) 167*8kB (UME) 117*16kB (UME) 8*32kB (UE) 3*64kB (E) 0*128kB 0*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048k...

Just spended ~ hour googling - all boards are based on GC-XX or I750X Chipsets - all for Xeons. There also some boards for Pentium 3. Can someone point me to a board with 64Bit 3.3v PCI for ordinary P4 with 800Mhz FSB. Thanks

Hi Guys, Has somebody encountered (significantly) different read/write speeds when using gmirror? I have 2xWD WD30EFRX RED drives which are configured as follows: $ gmirror status Name Status Components mirror/root COMPLETE ada0p2 (ACTIVE) ada1p2 (ACTIVE) mirror/data COMPLETE ada0p4 (ACTIVE) ada1p4 (ACTIVE) mirror/root is mounted

.../0xa0 [<c01175e8>] recalc_task_prio+0x88/0x150 [<c02eeedd>] schedule+0x3bd/0x680 [<c0124929>] sys_alarm+0x39/0x60 [<c0114eb0>] do_page_fault+0x0/0x66a [<c0108c17>] error_code+0x2b/0x30 lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 DMA: 1*4kB 0*8kB 0*16kB 1*32kB 0*64kB 0*128kB 0*256kB 1*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 548kB Normal: empty HighMem: empty Swap cache: add 120470, delete 120465, find 45260/94674, race 0+2 Free swap = 2096316kB Total swap = 2096376kB oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x1d2 DMA per-cpu: cpu 0 hot: low 30, high 90, batch 15 cpu 0 cold: low 0, high 30, batch 15 Normal pe...

...les:1328kB unstable:0kB bounce:0kB free_pcp:1196kB > local_pcp:152kB free_cma:0kB writeback_tmp:0kB pages_scanned:0 > all_unreclaimable? no > [ 1.971309] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0 > [ 1.971316] Node 0 DMA: 0*4kB 1*8kB (U) 0*16kB 1*32kB (U) 2*64kB (U) > 1*128kB (U) 1*256kB (U) 0*512kB 1*1024kB (U) 1*2048kB (M) 3*4096kB (M) = > 15912kB > [ 1.971343] Node 0 DMA32: 7*4kB (M) 18*8kB (UM) 7*16kB (EM) 3*32kB > (EM) 1*64kB (E) 2*128kB (UM) 1*256kB (E) 4*512kB (UM) 4*1024kB (UEM) > 4*2048kB (EM) 1011*4096kB (M) = 4156348kB > [ 1.971377] Node 0 Normal: 64*4kB (UEM) 1...

I am looking for a micro ssh server/client implementation. This implementation would have to be small enough to run on microprocessors. e.g. systems with <512KB memory and ~20Mhz 8bit processors - like a Rabbit or a PIC. I have looked around but have not found anything suitable. Does anyone have a recommendataion? Thanks in advance. Thomas DuBuisson

My ADSL connection speed is 512Kb up and 128Kb down. When making calls from Asterisk to IAX and back to the Asterisk, the sound is choppy and 20% of voice messages was lost. What is the production bandwidth requirement per internet call. I understand there is no guarantee of QoS but at least a benchmark to follow. -- David Kw...

...used systems that I can get for less than 150USD. I can''t seem to decide if I should splurge and get a 4x box for 25 dollars more than a 2x at a slightly higher clockspeed. 112952-001-B1-06 Proliant 6500 - 4xPIII Xeon500MHz/1MB, 256MB 100738-003-B1-06 Proliant 5500 - 2xPIIIXeon550MHz/512KB, 256MB Any suggestions? I read that domU''s will be able to see multiple processors in a later version of Xen. Should I go for the 4x hoping that feature will be supported with 32bit chips? It seems a lot of development talk I''ve been reading recently is in the 64bit arena. -...

...ernel: lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 Jun 18 08:45:21 lemodev kernel: HighMem free:0kB min:128kB low:160kB high:192kB active:0kB inactive:0kB present:0kB pages_s Jun 18 08:45:21 lemodev kernel: lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 Jun 18 08:45:21 lemodev kernel: DMA: 92*4kB 3*8kB 1*16kB 2*32kB 0*64kB 1*128kB 1*256kB 1*512kB 1*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = Jun 18 08:45:21 lemodev kernel: Normal: empty Jun 18 08:45:21 lemodev kernel: HighMem: empty Jun 18 08:45:21 lemodev kernel: Swap cache: add 362182, delete 362182, find 132895/144029, race 0+0 Jun 18 08:45:21 lemodev kernel: Free swap = 0kB Jun 18 08:45:21 lemodev kern...