search for: 512k

...6310M gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 64K num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 126M gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 128K num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 126M gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 256K num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 126M gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 512K num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 126M gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 1M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 126M gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 2M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 126M *BAD*gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 4M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -2M *BAD*gran_size: 64K...

Hi all, I''m sure I''m soing something wrong here. I am trying to set up a rate limit inside another rate limit. eg. I have a 512K rate limit on a particular VLAN. I am using an IFB so that packets passing through the bridge are counted at each port.(ie the throughput is limited to 512K, not just the traffic in one direction.) This part works OK, but I also want to limit a particular IP to much less than that, say 100K. Theref...

...type UC total RAM covered: 16296M gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 64K num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 56M gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 128K num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 56M gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 256K num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 56M gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 512K num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 56M gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 1M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 56M gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 2M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 56M gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 4M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 56M gran_size: 64K chunk_size...

Hi everybody, I have a theoretical question here. A 128K stream is a 128 KiloBITS (NOT kiloBYTES) per second stream; am I right? Is a 512k internet connection a 512 kiloBITS or 512 kiloBYTES connection? 128 KiloBITS = 16 KiloBYTES (8 bits = 1 byte). I am wondering if a 512k connection (upload and download) could THEORITICALLY handle 4 (512/128) or 32 (512/16) 128k streams? I am confused because I often read that to calculate the pot...

...num_reg: 8 lose cover RAM: 4865M Apr 11 17:25:36 kernel: gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 128K num_reg: 8 lose cover RAM: 4865M Apr 11 17:25:36 kernel: gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 256K num_reg: 8 lose cover RAM: 4865M Apr 11 17:25:36 kernel: gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 512K num_reg: 8 lose cover RAM: 4865M Apr 11 17:25:36 kernel: gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 1M num_reg: 8 lose cover RAM: 4865M Apr 11 17:25:36 kernel: gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 2M num_reg: 8 lose cover RAM: 4864M Apr 11 17:25:36 kernel: gran_size: 64K chunk_size:...

...some debug messages. It shows the client and asterisk negotiated the video capabilities without problem. However, the 'show channel ...' command shows there is only audio channel, no video channel. I don't understand why. The file I tried to play is $ ls -al /var/lib/asterisk/VOD/jolin-512k* -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 7975341 2007-03-09 13:16 /var/lib/asterisk/VOD/jolin-512k.gsm -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 236916736 2007-03-09 13:16 /var/lib/asterisk/VOD/jolin-512k.h263 both .gsm and .h263 are available. I'm sure the media files have no problem, since I can see the video by making a...

...0.141 11.287 > > 16K 8.250 8.402 15.976 16.736 > > 32K 13.327 13.204 19.013 20.515 > > 64K 21.241 21.341 20.973 21.879 > > 128K 21.851 22.354 21.816 23.203 > > 256K 21.408 21.693 21.846 24.088 > > 512K 21.600 21.899 21.921 24.106 > > > > guest -> host [Gbps] > > pkt_size before opt p 1 p 2+3 p 4+5 > > > > 32 0.045 0.046 0.057 0.057 > > 64 0.089 0.091 0.103 0.104 > > 128...

...rnel? netwarrior build-linux-2.6-pvops_x86_64 # dmesg |grep -i memo released 151863 pages of unused memory initial memory mapped : 0 - 20000000 init_memory_mapping: 0000000000000000-00000000aff90000 Memory: 2749108k/2883136k available (4930k kernel code, 392k absent, 133136k reserved, 2304k data, 512k init) Non-volatile memory driver v1.3 Freeing unused kernel memory: 512k freed EDAC amd64: This node reports that Memory ECC is currently disabled, set F3x44[22] (0000:00:18.3). [drm] Setting GART location based on new memory map netwarrior build-linux-2.6-pvops_x86_64 # free total...

...of filling the balloon to 15GB with a 16GB RAM VM. =============================== 32K Byte (cover 1GB of RAM) Time spends on inflating: 2031ms --------------------------------------------- 64K Byte (cover 2GB of RAM) Time spends on inflating: 1507ms -------------------------------------------- 512K Byte (cover 16GB of RAM) Time spends on inflating: 1237ms ================================ If possible, a big bitmap is better for performance. Liang

...of filling the balloon to 15GB with a 16GB RAM VM. =============================== 32K Byte (cover 1GB of RAM) Time spends on inflating: 2031ms --------------------------------------------- 64K Byte (cover 2GB of RAM) Time spends on inflating: 1507ms -------------------------------------------- 512K Byte (cover 16GB of RAM) Time spends on inflating: 1237ms ================================ If possible, a big bitmap is better for performance. Liang

...want to use this box for other purposes. It has a single NIC, connected to the switch/router. Operating within my home LAN, I should be able to communicate with it at the typical full-duplex 100BaseT speeds. However, when it''s involved in the archive process, the DSL connection (5M/512k) get saturated. I wanted to setup some sort of shaping on this box to control how much of the DSL connection it consumes. I initially went to wondershaper/ctshaper - but I realized that this is actually going to hurt me. With ctshaper enabled, with the DSL tuned settings of 5M/512k - I'...

...ff Shang >Sent: Sunday, February 29, 2004 12:59 PM >To: icecast@xiph.org >Subject: Re: [icecast] bit/bytes > >On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, MacSym wrote: > > > A 128K stream is a 128 KiloBITS (NOT kiloBYTES) per second stream; am I > > right? > >Right. > > > Is a 512k internet connection a 512 kiloBITS or 512 kiloBYTES > > connection? > >Internet connections are also expressed in bits, or kilobits, not >kilobytes. In this sense, calling it a 512k connection is actually wrong, >as this implies kilobytes, not kilobits. But everyone seems to do...

...of RAM. This next part was not well researched as I had a colleague bothering me late on Xmas Eve that he needed 14 TB immediately to move data to from an HPC cluster. I built an XFS file system straight onto the (raid 6) logical device made up of all sixteen drives with. > mkfs.xfs -d su=512k,sw=14 /dev/sda where "512k" is the Stripe-unit size of the single logical device built on the raid controller. "14" is from the total number of drives minus two (raid 6 redundancy). Any comments on the above from XFS users would be helpful! I mounted the filesystem with th...

...a client of our. They have two locations, with one server each. The servers terminate 3 standard POTS lines into a Sangoma A200D card. The servers are IBM x3250 1RU servers (1GB Ram, Raid 1 160GB HDD, Dual Core Xenon Processors). We are using Trixbox 2.2, and G729 all around. Each site has two (2) 512k/512k ADSL connections terminating into a Cisco 877W router (using an additional 'dumb' modem in a separate VLAN for the extra dsl connection). Using policy based routing, all Voice Data goes over one DSL connection (the one that terminates directly into the router), and all other traffic (e...

...DED here! Thanks! QUESTION: Is there a possibility, so that --max-size AFFECTS --delete actually? Situation where it makes sense: Imagine that I had the rule --max- size=1M and my backup-storage is satisfying. But one day it ain't enough anymore, and I decide to lower down to --max-size=512K. The files larger than 512K at the destination DO NOT GET DELETED! Currently the only solution is to rm -r /my/backup/* and then start the process again with the new size limitations. The manpage of rsync 3.0.6 for option --max-size reads: [...] This option is a transfer rule, not an exclude...

...8K 5.637 5.676 10.141 11.287 > 16K 8.250 8.402 15.976 16.736 > 32K 13.327 13.204 19.013 20.515 > 64K 21.241 21.341 20.973 21.879 > 128K 21.851 22.354 21.816 23.203 > 256K 21.408 21.693 21.846 24.088 > 512K 21.600 21.899 21.921 24.106 > > guest -> host [Gbps] > pkt_size before opt p 1 p 2+3 p 4+5 > > 32 0.045 0.046 0.057 0.057 > 64 0.089 0.091 0.103 0.104 > 128 0.170 0.179 0.192 0.20...

...8K 5.637 5.676 10.141 11.287 > 16K 8.250 8.402 15.976 16.736 > 32K 13.327 13.204 19.013 20.515 > 64K 21.241 21.341 20.973 21.879 > 128K 21.851 22.354 21.816 23.203 > 256K 21.408 21.693 21.846 24.088 > 512K 21.600 21.899 21.921 24.106 > > guest -> host [Gbps] > pkt_size before opt p 1 p 2+3 p 4+5 > > 32 0.045 0.046 0.057 0.057 > 64 0.089 0.091 0.103 0.104 > 128 0.170 0.179 0.192 0.20...

...8 3.326 6.044 6.195 8K 5.637 5.676 10.141 11.287 16K 8.250 8.402 15.976 16.736 32K 13.327 13.204 19.013 20.515 64K 21.241 21.341 20.973 21.879 128K 21.851 22.354 21.816 23.203 256K 21.408 21.693 21.846 24.088 512K 21.600 21.899 21.921 24.106 guest -> host [Gbps] pkt_size before opt p 1 p 2+3 p 4+5 32 0.045 0.046 0.057 0.057 64 0.089 0.091 0.103 0.104 128 0.170 0.179 0.192 0.200 256 0.364 0.351 0.3...

...8 3.326 6.044 6.195 8K 5.637 5.676 10.141 11.287 16K 8.250 8.402 15.976 16.736 32K 13.327 13.204 19.013 20.515 64K 21.241 21.341 20.973 21.879 128K 21.851 22.354 21.816 23.203 256K 21.408 21.693 21.846 24.088 512K 21.600 21.899 21.921 24.106 guest -> host [Gbps] pkt_size before opt p 1 p 2+3 p 4+5 32 0.045 0.046 0.057 0.057 64 0.089 0.091 0.103 0.104 128 0.170 0.179 0.192 0.200 256 0.364 0.351 0.3...

...ter the end of a function, >> or even after any unconditional branch). Find everything else within range >> of that thunk and fix it up. Repeat. >> > > I don't think this analysis is correct. Assume a 1M branch displacement > for short jumps. Consider: > > secA: 512K (contains a jump "jumpA" at offset 0 that needs a thunk (it > doesn't matter where it needs to jump to, just that it definitely needs a > thunk)) > secB: 512K > secC: 512K (contains a jump "jumpC" at offset 0 that jumps to offset 0 in > secA (i.e., just barely...