search for: 512000bit

...b overhead 0b cburst 501375b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b level 7 Sent 32821394 bytes 994 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) rate 3556Kbit 10pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0 lended: 0 borrowed: 0 giants: 1128 tokens: 4325 ctokens: 4325 class htb 1:10 parent 1:1 leaf 10: prio 0 quantum 3000 rate 512000bit ceil 512000bit burst 1755b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b cburst 1755b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b level 0 Sent 34256069 bytes 701 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) rate 3554Kbit 8pps backlog 0b 105p requeues 0 lended: 596 borrowed: 0 giants: 1128 tokens: -52724 ctokens: -52724

...ers becouse if i do tc -s class show dev imq0 or imq1 while uploading or downloading traffic doesnt get to right class. If i take look in iptables -t mangle -L -n -v the packets are marked well OUTPUT OF tc -s class show dev imq0 class htb 10:22 parent 10:2 leaf 8026: prio 0 rate 128000bit ceil 512000bit burst 1615b cburst 1.625Kb Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0 lended: 0 borrowed: 0 giants: 0 tokens: 103424 ctokens: 26624 class htb 10:23 parent 10:2 leaf 8027: prio 0 rate 128000bit ceil 512000bit burst 1615b cburst 1.625Kb Sent...

...upper-limit applies, traffic doesn''t do up more than 4kb/s. The 1:4 is still functional, but 1:2, the default class starts backlogging and dropping as hell: class hfsc 1: root Sent 0 bytes 0 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) period 0 level 2 class hfsc 1:1 parent 1: ls m1 0bit d 0us m2 512000bit ul m1 0bit d 0us m2 512000bit Sent 0 bytes 0 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) <-- This is weird too ^_^ period 2643 work 821712 bytes level 1 class hfsc 1:2 parent 1:1 ls m1 0bit d 0us m2 2000bit ul m1 0bit d 0us m2 400000bit Sent 477205 bytes 3874 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0) backlog...

...7b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b cburst 14387b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b level 7 Sent 1610799 bytes 6437 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) rate 1952bit 5pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0 lended: 0 borrowed: 0 giants: 0 tokens: 1140 ctokens: 1140 class htb 2:20 parent 2:1 leaf 20: prio 0 quantum 6400 rate 512000bit ceil 512000bit burst 1663b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b cburst 1663b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b level 0 Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0 lended: 0 borrowed: 0 giants: 0 tokens: 26624 ctokens: 26624 class htb 2:40 parent 2:1 leaf 40: prio 0 qua...

Hello, after spending several hours reading archives, I decided to write new post. I successfully set up packet classification, made some basic HTB setup, made some simple graphical representation from HTB statistics data... BUT, I cannot figure out how to refine HTB to get this behaviour: I need that class "p2p" should be the last one to get some link capacity. If I set both RATE

Hi guys, i have a little doubt ; I have eth0 ethernet and eth1 wireless , and they are bridged in br0 Is there any difference in the behavior between do tc qdisc add dev br0 root sfq OR tc qdisc add dev eth0 root sfq && tc qdisc add dev eth1 root sfq -- []''s Salatiel "O maior prazer do inteligente é bancar o idiota diante de um idiota que banca o

Hello. I have a linux server connected to a gigabit lan, and though that lan to a 768kbps/768kbps DSL modem. I''m trying to shape my webserver running on port 80/443 down to 512kbps, while leaving all other ports alone. The current configuration script that I''m using is as follows: tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 99 tc class add dev

...urst 2Kb/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b level 0 Sent 96523510 bytes 104979 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) rate 48552bit 5pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0 lended: 84663 borrowed: 20316 giants: 0 tokens: 109056 ctokens: -10028 class htb 1:10 parent 1:2 leaf 10: prio 3 quantum 1000 rate 20000bit ceil 512000bit burst 6399b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b cburst 1855b/8 mpu 0b overhead 0b level 0 Sent 907525 bytes 2857 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) rate 3616bit 1pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0 lended: 2735 borrowed: 122 giants: 0 tokens: 2601780 ctokens: 28928 class htb 1:2 root rate 10000Kbit ceil 10000...

Hi all, Can you tell me where is the documentation for the new IFB (implemented in kernels > 2.6.16). Thanks in advance! Nikolay

I have to match my packets based on MAC address, which I cannot do in the POSTROUTING chain, so I do it in PREROUTING using MARK. Then, I match on the MARK in the POSTROUTING chain to do a CLASSIFY. But this does not seem to work: wireless-r1 bwlimit # iptables -L -v -n -t mangle Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 3353K packets, 941M bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source