search for: 510k

Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "510k".

Did you mean: 10k
2006 Nov 17
1
Re: build issues
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 08:32:02AM -0800, Josh Coalson wrote: > OK, I built on one of the sourceforge machines and made a bunch > more fixes. there are a couple innocuous warnings but the tests > all pass for me. I also checked in changes to the vendor string, > can you try one more time now? Yep, all 7 tests pass now. Yay! Attached is an autogen integration patch: (a) pass -I m4
2007 Jun 21
0
Network issue in RHCS/GFS environment
...2202k| 0 0 : 584k 26k: 462B 0 > 0 2 49 49 0 0| 532k 2098k| 0 35B: 743k 4544k: 809B 0 > 0 1 50 49 0 0| 484k 80k| 35B 0 : 573k 24k: 569B 0 > 0 1 50 49 0 0| 500k 2352k| 0 0 : 548k 739k: 440B 0 > 0 1 50 49 0 0| 510k 0 | 35B 35B: 604k 1775k:1066B 0 > 0 2 50 49 0 0| 526k 2212k| 0 0 : 575k 25k: 412B 0 > 0 1 50 49 0 0| 534k 458k| 0 35B: 663k 2804k:1739B 0 > 0 1 50 49 0 0| 538k 0 | 35B 0 : 574k 37k: 591B 0 > 0 11 37 51 0 0|...
2006 Dec 29
6
CentOS 4.5 and CentOS 5.0 News
Hi, I use CentOS as a firewall/proxy/webserver/fileserver in my small network. As the small-spec machine with CentOS is heavily loaded/used I can't afford downtime. 20 GB, pentium II with only 128 MB RAM. However I want to know the news on 4.5 is it due soon? Can I gain more by running CentOS 3.x range on such an old machine like mine? Will CentOS 5.0 mean you need a minimum of 512 RAM?
2006 Nov 20
0
[LLVMdev] FP emulation (continued)
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006, Roman Levenstein wrote: > I still have some questions about FP emulation for my embedded target. > To recap a bit: > My target only has integer registers and no hardware support for FP. FP > is supported only via emulation. Only f64 is supported. All FP > operations should be implemented to use i32 registers. ok > allocation. But anyway, I have an almost
2006 Nov 17
2
[LLVMdev] FP emulation (continued)
Hi, I still have some questions about FP emulation for my embedded target. To recap a bit: My target only has integer registers and no hardware support for FP. FP is supported only via emulation. Only f64 is supported. All FP operations should be implemented to use i32 registers. Based on the fruitful discussions on this list I was already able to implement mapping of the FP operations to
2006 Nov 20
3
[LLVMdev] FP emulation (continued)
...cause LLVM considers them to be float in any case and to have a 32bit representation in memory. Or do I need to handle this equivalence in the front-end only? ____________________________________________________________________________________ Sponsored Link Mortgage rates near 39yr lows. $510k for $1,698/mo. Calculate new payment! www.LowerMyBills.com/lre
2006 Dec 30
0
RE: CentOS Digest, Vol 23, Issue 30
.... Runs steady and fast enough (good sites appx. 700K chars/sec. Cable and in the boonies responsible for that). I have also run it on my wifes discarded Aptiva (486 and 64MB? 32MB?) and my AMD "486 clone", x586 100MHz 36MB. Only difference is speed. Aptiva about 430K chars/sec, AMD about 510K chars/sec. Like Aleksandr, I'm loaded with old used ceapo machines too (386SX anyone?). If you can get a $20 machain (and one for backup?) you would be making a wise investment, IMO, by having a firewall-dedicated node separate from your "server/ws". > > Fred > <snip si...