Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "50mbyte".
Did you mean:
80mbyte
2013 Feb 25
1
smb2 vs. NT1
...D
max protocol = SMB2
min protocol = SMB2
[projects]
path = /W/Projects
browseable = yes
public = yes
guest ok = yes
read only = no
force user = user
force group = user
The speed is fine with this configuration, around 100Mbyte/s. If I change protocol to NT1, the speed
drops to around 50Mbyte/s.
This is from man page:
NT1: Current up to date version of the protocol. Used by Windows NT. Known as CIFS.
SMB2: Re-implementation of the SMB protocol. Used by Windows Vista and newer. The Samba
implementation of SMB2 is currently marked experimental!
Why is it still experimental? What does...
2012 Aug 07
0
Performance problem using clustered samba via ctdb
...ench4.0
distribution.
What I found out is really strange: I first tried to simulate 50 clients
on one of the cluster nodes:
$ bin/smbtorture //host1/smbtest1 -UUNIKO/smbtest1%password bench.nbench
--loadfile=dbench-4.0/client.txt --num-progs=100 -t 30
The result is an average throughput rate of 50MByte/sec. Ok do far.
Now I distributed the 100 clients on all four nodes by starting an
smnbtoture with 25 clients on each of the cluster members:
$ bin/smbtorture //host[1,2,3,4]/smbtest[1,2,3,4] .... --num-progs=25
-t 30
The throughput results for the four hosts are now:
4.4 MBytes/sec, 4.6 MByte...
2014 May 20
2
Samba 4 + Windows XP very slow - especially noticeable with many files
Hi,
After our upgrade from Samba 3.x to 4.1.6 we are having major
performance issues. Today, I've been able to nail it down to a simple
test case.
What strikes me is that Windows XP takes about 25 seconds for one job,
while it only costs 3 seconds on Windows 7.
I have two tests:
1000 files of 10k each (total ~10Mb):
* Linux on localhost or a remote host (1GE or 10GE): 5.5 seconds
*