search for: 50df24a4

+Daniel & Michael who work on the LNT infrastructure & might have some thoughts on the differences & their merits & motivations. On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 4:05 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > David, > > I got some more work on the Livermore Loops and I found out that the issue > is the difference in the parameters between a single step and a

David, I got some more work on the Livermore Loops and I found out that the issue is the difference in the parameters between a single step and a multi step compilation. When you compile "clang kernel06.c" it works fine, but when you get all steps (clang -emit-llvm + llvm-as + opt + llc etc), the defaults options of each and how they interact is showing a bug in the code generated.

...d, so we would get similar results, but it doesn't seem > to be > > the case with clang. > > > > cheers, > > --renato > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130107/50df24a4/attachment.html>