Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "50878096kb".
2018 Nov 03
5
reading old dump backups from 2009
...38
????? .
????? .
????? .
?DUMP: 100.00% done at 4075 kB/s, finished in 0:00
? DUMP: Closing u1_l0_04-29-09_md1.dump
? DUMP: Volume 1 completed at: Wed Apr 29 16:00:09 2009
? DUMP: Volume 1 took 6:35:04
? DUMP: Volume 1 transfer rate: 2146 kB/s
? DUMP: Volume 1 96607840kB uncompressed, 50878096kB compressed, 1.899:1
? DUMP: 96607840 blocks (94343.59MB) on 1 volume(s)
? DUMP: finished in 23704 seconds, throughput 4075 kBytes/sec
? DUMP: Date of this level 0 dump: Wed Apr 29 09:24:36 2009
? DUMP: Date this dump completed:? Wed Apr 29 16:00:09 2009
? DUMP: Average transfer rate: 2146 kB/s...
2018 Nov 03
0
reading old dump backups from 2009
...zlib)
> DUMP: finished in 23704 seconds, throughput 4075 kBytes/sec
> DUMP: Date of this level 0 dump: Wed Apr 29 09:24:36 2009
> DUMP: Date this dump completed: Wed Apr 29 16:00:09 2009
> DUMP: Average transfer rate: 2146 kB/s
> DUMP: Wrote 96607840kB uncompressed, 50878096kB compressed, 1.899:1
> DUMP: DUMP IS DONE
The dump is compressed. What was the command line you used to create
the dump file?
Have you tried using
restore tzvf u1_l0_04-29-09_md1.dump
>
> Have there been any changes to the format of dump files and if so, is
> there a version...