Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "503d".
Did you mean:
03d
1999 Jun 25
2
Machine Upgraded & smbd/nmbd won't start
...ervices
Linux Uber Alles perl || die
...there are two types of command interfaces in the world of
computing: good interfaces and user interfaces.
- Dan Bernstein, Author of qmail
PGP Fingerprint = 503D A72D AF41 2AD1 D433 C514 98D9 9A39 B25A 2405
1999 Jun 02
1
nmbd errors on console
...ervices
Linux Uber Alles perl || die
...there are two types of command interfaces in the world of
computing: good interfaces and user interfaces.
- Dan Bernstein, Author of qmail
PGP Fingerprint = 503D A72D AF41 2AD1 D433 C514 98D9 9A39 B25A 2405
1999 Jun 02
0
SWAT status report wrong
...ervices
Linux Uber Alles perl || die
...there are two types of command interfaces in the world of
computing: good interfaces and user interfaces.
- Dan Bernstein, Author of qmail
PGP Fingerprint = 503D A72D AF41 2AD1 D433 C514 98D9 9A39 B25A 2405
2008 Feb 15
4
[LLVMdev] LLVMdev Digest, Vol 44, Issue 47
...gt;
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:39:06 -0800
> From: Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org>
> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] an llvm-gcc bug
> To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>
> Message-ID: <9345E8E7-503D-483F-90DD-1DA6FD64B6F3 at nondot.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
>
>
> On Feb 15, 2008, at 11:27 AM, Dale Johannesen wrote:
>
> >> I don't think so, I have reached the same conclusion. You can pass
> >> the gcc typ...
2003 May 14
20
Call forwarding
Yo,
Inspired by the example in the tips & tricks-section of
"http://www.junghanns.net/asterisk/", I built a more elaborate
call divert-feature. This one validates if the extension a call-forward
is to be set to is actually valid for the current context and
additionally saves this context into the DB and always uses it to
originate the divert from, as you can't expect the
2008 Feb 15
0
[LLVMdev] LLVMdev Digest, Vol 44, Issue 47
...----
> >
> > Message: 5
> > Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:39:06 -0800
> > From: Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org>
> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] an llvm-gcc bug
> > To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>
> > Message-ID: <9345E8E7-503D-483F-90DD-1DA6FD64B6F3 at nondot.org>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
> >
> >
> > On Feb 15, 2008, at 11:27 AM, Dale Johannesen wrote:
> >
> > >> I don't think so, I have reached the same conclusion. You can...