search for: 500g

I installed a Solaris 10 development box on a 500G root mirror and later I received some smaller drives. I learned from this list its better to have the root mirror on the smaller small drives and then create another mirror on the original 500G drives so I copied everything that was on the small drives onto the 500G mirror to free up the smaller dr...

I'm trying to create a 500GB lv volume on a 500GB physical volume, but can't: [root at francois-pc ~]# pvscan PV /dev/sdd VG freenas lvm2 [500.00 GB / 500.00 GB free] PV /dev/sdc VG thecus lvm2 [1010.00 GB / 910.00 GB free] PV /dev/mapper/ddf1_RAIDp2 VG VolGroup00 lv...

...fine. I can''t tell which drive it is though! The error message and format command let me know which pair the bad drive is in, but I don''t know how to get any more info than that like the serial number etc. to know which disk it is. Is there a command to do this? All it shows is a 500G WD drive producing read errors and format shows identical info for both of the 500G WD drives.

OK, I wanted to replace the 500G disks in a Dell T20 server with new 2TB disks. The machine has 4 SATA ports, one used for the optical disk and three for the hard drives. It is set up with /dev/sda and /dev/sdb with each three partitions: 1 -- VFAT (for EFI) 2 -- ext4 (for /boot) 3 -- LVM /dev/sda2 and /dev/sdb2 are a mirr...

I upgraded my Centos 4.7 server last night. Switched from a cheaper 50$ asus motherboard to a Supermicro motherboard. I also, using dd, copied entire 500g SATA seagate drive to new 500g SATA seagate drive so as to have two copies in case something went wrong. Anyway, now I keep getting this error: Nov 21 06:08:33 server kernel: hda: status timeout: status=0xd0 { Busy } Nov 21 06:08:33 server kernel: Nov 21 06:08:33 server kernel: ide: failed opcode...

...931.5G 0 disk ??sda1 8:1 0 200M 0 part /boot/efi ??sda2 8:2 0 1G 0 part /boot ??sda3 8:3 0 500.1G 0 part ? ??md127 9:127 0 500G 0 raid1 ? ??luks-5e007234-cd4c-47c6-b305-734f353a4405 253:0 0 500G 0 crypt / ??sda4 8:4 0 4G 0 part ? ??md126 9:126 0 4G 0 raid1 ? ??luks-9dd9aacc-e702-43d...

...her on a live system or a system booted from a DVD (CentOS 6.9 boot/install DVD) -- efibootmgr wants a kernel module named efivars that does not seem to exist. At Mon, 28 May 2018 18:25:39 -0400 (EDT) CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> wrote: > > OK, I wanted to replace the 500G disks in a Dell T20 server with new 2TB > disks. The machine has 4 SATA ports, one used for the optical disk and three > for the hard drives. It is set up with /dev/sda and /dev/sdb with each three > partitions: > > 1 -- VFAT (for EFI) > 2 -- ext4 (for /boot) > 3 -- LVM...

I''d like to replace/upgrade two 500GB disks in RaidZ2 vdev with 1TB disks, but I have some preliminary questions/concerns before trying ''zfs replace dpool ?'' Will ZFS permit this replacement? Will ZFS use the extra space in a heterogeneous RaidZ2 vdev, or is the size limited by the smallest disk in the vdev? Thank...

Hi, after some searching i didn't came up with an answer so please excuse if this is a total newbie question. My problem: I have server A which has a big (>500G) database like file. On server B i want to have a copy of this file which i don't want to copy each time but sync the deltas so that only the deltas are written once a day. Bandwidth between A and B isn't the problem. The sync should be as fast as possible. So i want to achive somethink...

...il. I click in, and nothing happens. When I mv the same "broken" folder to an EXT4 file system via the server's command line, I can repair the acls using: get acls: /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool ntacl get --as-sddl /${ZPOOL}/Lou/stuff/ returns: ?O:S-1-5-21-1345677-xxxxx-2594716733-500G..etc set acls: /usr/local/samba/bin/samba-tool ntacl set ?O:S-1-5-21-1345677-xxxxx-2594716733-500G..etc? /${EXT4 Sharename}/Lou/stuff/ ...after which I update the smb.conf entry and can browse the folder as normal, as long as it stays on the EXT4-backed share. The acl-compliance tests: setfattr -...

Hi, I've seen comments about the poor performance of these cards with raid 5 configs. I have an old card with 3 x 500G IDE drives connected in raid 5 and I'm getting around 10mb/s write performance. :-( I'm seeing high iowait figures at times and associated very high cpu load average figures, probably because, under load, everything is stacked up waiting for the disks to actually do something. A non-ra...

I have configured 2x 500G sata HDD as Software RAID1 with three partitions md0,md1 and md2 with md2 as 400+ gigs Now it is almost 36 hours the status is cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid1] md0 : active raid1 hdb1[1] hda1[0] 104320 blocks [2/2] [UU] resync=DELAYED md1 : active raid1 hdb2[1] hda2[0]...

I've been using Samba with OpenLDAP with great success on normal servers. Recently however, it appeared to us that for remote locations it is more economically viable to replace Samba servers with Samba running on little routers like ASUS WL-500g with openwrt firmware/software. It has a broadcom/mipsel CPU, and thanks to openwrt (http://openwrt.org), it is possible to run lots of software on it. Pretty nice for small offices - small, no fan, no hard disk etc. other moving parts (you can connect a USB stick to it if you want to store fil...

...if this is for stuff under, say, /var/www, I'd > make a separate logical drive/partition, and mount that, rsync everything > from /var/www to that, then shut down the web, and remount the new > filesystem on /var/www. > > Root, itself, doesn't need to be huge. We're using 500G, and seriously > considering making it 125G in the future, with data, or web stuff, is on a > separate partition, so when there's a sudden explosion of data, / is safe. > > mark > Mark, Thanks for your input. Well, we are talking much smaller scale here (only about 30...

Thanks everyone for the suggestions. I finally got a completion with this command: dd conv=noerror,sync iflag=direct bs=4096 if=/dev/sdb of=disk.img Copying it now to see if it worked. Jerry

...but it will not be noticeable (most voice files are 5-100kb, so it should be ok... But writing to them.. Not sure.. It should be ok as well I'm guessing as kernel will provide some caching (since you have G and not GS it has less ram, so maybe chaching is not an option) Best would be to get WL-500G. It has a USB port so you can plug a USB memory stick into it. It will be faster and will give you more storage cheaper then SD. > I'm using a Linksys WRT54G router and it works great but it only has > 4MB of storage. One of my only options is to modify the router to > accept SD car...

Hi, I've got a buffalo 1TB DriveStation run in RAID 1 mode, i.e. 500G space available, but that beast is preformatted in vfat. Buffalo doesn't recommend to run it as ext2/ext3, so I mount a vfat drive wich has the limitations "no symlinks, no uids, no gids, etc.". As I just want to use the DriveStation as a backup target, I did the following: I crea...

Hi I'm transferring some acl's. They seem to work OK but I get an error. e.g. copying the acl from directory sd to directory sd2: samba-tool ntacl get --as-sddl sd O:S-1-5-21-443838659-2890314986-1722269781-500G:S-1-5-21-443838659-2890314986-1722269781-1118D:(A;;0x001f01ff;;;SY)(A;OICI;0x001301bf;;;S-1-5-21-443838659-2890314986-1722269781-1118)(A;OICI;0x001f01ff;;;S-1-5-21-443838659-2890314986-1722269781-500) samba-tool ntacl set "O:S-1-5-21-443838659-2890314986-1722269781-500G:S-1-5-21-443838659-...

.../home is mostly read only accesses with a ratio 10:1 read/write. I'm a little bit concerned that the log writes in /var/log could impact read performance on /home causing disk head movements or that a little/non issue with modern Raid controllers? What would give best performance Scenario 1 8*500G Raid 6 /home and operating system Scenario 2 6*500GB Raid 6 /home 2*250GB Raid 1 operating system Looking for feedback Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070124/90bf84b2/attachment.html&g...

I am seeing what seems to be a notable limit on read performance of an ext3 filesystem. If anyone could offer some insight it would be helpful. Background: 12 x 500G SATA disks in a Hardware RAID enclosure connected via 2Gb/s FC to a 4 x 2.6 Ghz system with 4GB ram running RHEL4.5. Initially the enclosure was configured RAID5 10+1 parity, although I've also tried RAID 50 and currently RAID 0. I've varied chunk sizes from 64-256K. Problem: No matter wh...