search for: 5000b

...the long mail... I get: Inline spilling aN40_0_7:%vreg1954 [5000r,5056r:0)[5056r,5348r:1) 0 at 5000r 1 at 5056r At this point I have the following live ranges for vreg1954: %vreg1954 [5000r,5056r:0)[5056r,5348r:1) 0 at 5000r 1 at 5056r And vreg1954 is mentioned in these instructions: 5000B %vreg1954:hi16<def,read-undef> = mv_any16 32766 [...] 5048B mv_ar16_r16_rmod1 %vreg1954:hi16, %vreg1753 5056B %vreg1954:lo16<def> = mv_nimm6_ar16 0 5064B Store40FI %vreg1954, <fi#2> [...] 5128B %vreg223<def> = COPY %vreg1954 [...] 5216B %vreg1178<def...

...t->offset; It's a update to offset (the size of email) in zlib, but if you update this value with a new number, the W flag in email is NOT updated. This is the original file, without update the or increase offset. 1273155226.M512158P16310.brc,S=435,W=390:2,S This is the file updated with 5000b more. 1273155226.M512158P16310.brc,S=5435,W=390:2,S The S is updated, but W not. OK, this not matter in zlib plugin, because the physical size is the email uncompressed, but if you use the zlib as example, and you use this value (saved_physical_size) to update your saved email size, it can't...

Dear Community, sorry for the somewhat dumb question. Maybe someone has any pointer to how to setup the RED queue to mark pakets with ECN. In particular what are appropriate parameter settings for limit, min, max, etc. All my trials end up with either "RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument", although the command line (at least for me) looks fine in regard to what is said on the

Hi Quentin, On 08/15/14 19:01, Quentin Colombet wrote: [...] >> The question is: How should true subregister definitions be >> expressed so that they do not interfere with each other? See the >> detailed problem description below. > > We do have a limitation in our current liveness tracking for > sub-register. Therefore, I am not sure that is possible. > >