search for: 4ubuntu5

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 24 matches for "4ubuntu5".

Did you mean: 1ubuntu5
2010 Nov 05
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc conigure error
...ns. Then make, make install. This works fine. Then I cd to llvm-gcc-obj, configure with --prefix=/home/tony/llvm/llvm-gcc-install --enable-llvm=/home/tony/llvm/llvm-obj among other options. Then when I do make I get the configure error. I am using Ubuntu 10.04 x86_64, with gcc 4.4.3 (Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5). I downloaded the llvm-2.8 and llvm-gcc4.2-2.8 tarballs from llvm.org. I don't see why I'm getting this configure error when I am following the README and specifying --enable-llvm when I configure. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/llvm-gcc-conigure-error-tp30143434p3...
2012 May 11
15
Errors of doing "make install-tools" with xen-4.2-unstable?
Hi, When I do the "make install-tools" with xen-4.2-unstable, there are some errors about "warn_unused_result". Is it the error in code or the error in the compiling environment? Thank you so much. gcc -O1 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -m64 -g -fno-strict-aliasing -std=gnu99 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wdeclaration-after-statement -D__XEN_TOOLS__ -MMD -MF .tapdisk-queue.o.d
2010 Nov 05
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc conigure error
...nfigure with > --prefix=/home/tony/llvm/llvm-gcc-install > --enable-llvm=/home/tony/llvm/llvm-obj among other options. Then when I do > make I get the configure error. Try --enable-llvm=/home/tony/llvm/llvm-install > > I am using Ubuntu 10.04 x86_64, with gcc 4.4.3 (Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5). I > downloaded the llvm-2.8 and llvm-gcc4.2-2.8 tarballs from llvm.org. I don't > see why I'm getting this configure error when I am following the README and > specifying --enable-llvm when I configure. > -- > View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/llvm-gcc-co...
2011 Oct 24
1
[LLVMdev] build warnings
...'const clang::Decl*' to type 'clang::Decl*' casts away qualifiers llvm[4]: Linking Release+Asserts Shared Library libclang.so This is with gcc version 4.5.0 20100604 [gcc-4_5-branch revision 160292] (SUSE Linux) on openSUSE 11.3 "Teal" Also gcc version 4.4.3 (Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5) on Ubuntu 10.04 LTS -- GCS a+ e++ d- C++ ULS$ L+$ !E- W++ P+++$ w++$ tv+ b++ DI D++ 5++ The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers. Life is complex, with real and imaginary parts. "Ok, it boots. Which means it must be bug-free and perfect. " -- Linus Torvalds...
2010 Sep 07
2
remus failure -xen 4.0.1: xc_domain_restore cannot pin page tables
...-3.0-x86_64 xen-3.0-x86_32p hvm-3.0-x86_32 hvm-3.0-x86_32p hvm-3.0-x86_64 xen_scheduler : credit xen_pagesize : 4096 platform_params : virt_start=0xffff800000000000 xen_commandline : dummy=dummy dom0_mem=4096M cc_compiler : gcc version 4.4.3 (Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5) xend_config_format : 4 ------------------------------------------------------ I need the 2.6.18 domU because of the suspend event channel support. -- perception is but an offspring of its own self _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen...
2011 Oct 23
5
[LLVMdev] build warnings
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 12:24 AM, James Molloy wrote: > Hi Paul, > > That should be easy enough, because the LLVM build has no warnings in it! > > Some of us build with -Werror, and even with those of us that don't warnings are not tolerated. You're already seeing all the warnings that are coming out of the build :) So, all the "variable might be used
2011 Oct 29
4
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
...quiet the machine, bind the processes to one cpu, etc.). But they should be good enough for discussion. I'm using LLVM head r143101, with the attached patch applied, and clang head r143100 on an x86_64 machine (some kind of Intel Xeon). For the gcc comparison, I'm using build Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5. gcc was run -O3 without any other optimization flags. opt was run -vectorize -unroll-allow-partial -O3 with no other optimization flags (the patch adds the -vectorize option). llc was just given -O3. Below I've included results using the benchmark program by Maleki, et al. See: An Evaluation...
2011 Oct 26
0
[LLVMdev] build warnings
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:07 AM, James Molloy wrote: > That's interesting, what version of GCC are you using? > As I said, gcc version 4.5.0 20100604 [gcc-4_5-branch revision 160292] (SUSE Linux) on openSUSE 11.3 "Teal" Also gcc version 4.4.3 (Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5) on Ubuntu 10.04 LTS -- GCS a+ e++ d- C++ ULS$ L+$ !E- W++ P+++$ w++$ tv+ b++ DI D++ 5++ The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers. Life is complex, with real and imaginary parts. "Ok, it boots. Which means it must be bug-free and perfect. " -- Linus Torvalds &...
2010 Sep 06
1
Help debugging lockup when running wine
...TS \n \l Code: $ lspci | grep -i vga 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation G73 [GeForce 7300 GT] (rev a2) Code: $ cat /proc/driver/nvidia/version NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86 Kernel Module 256.44 Thu Jul 29 01:30:36 PDT 2010 GCC version: gcc version 4.4.3 (Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5) Code: WINEDEBUG=+reg wine Apps/SimCity\ 4.exe 2>errror.log And the output was very uninteresting...last few lines were all like Code: fixme:dsound:IDirectSoundBufferImpl_Restore (0x1c07d8):stub fixme:imm:ImmGetOpenStatus (0x130ea0): semi-stub fixme:imm:ImmGetOpenStatus (0x130ea0): s...
2010 Jul 08
1
[LLVMdev] X86 gcc and clang have incompatible calling conventions for returning some small structs?
...the function new_s() both the current Ubuntu gcc and the current Ubuntu clang generate code to return struct s in registers. However for the function new_s3() the gcc compiler uses the stack, whereas clang uses registers, so the generated code is not compatible. $ gcc --version gcc (Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5) 4.4.3 $ clang --version clang version 1.1 (branches/release_27) Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Thread model: posix It is possible that this is specific to the Ubuntu clang or gcc, but it seems unlikely that the Ubuntu people would tinker with this. More generally, I'm looking for the exact sp...
2011 Oct 29
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
...gt; processes to one cpu, etc.). But they should be good enough for > discussion. > > I'm using LLVM head r143101, with the attached patch applied, and clang > head r143100 on an x86_64 machine (some kind of Intel Xeon). For the gcc > comparison, I'm using build Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5. gcc was run -O3 > without any other optimization flags. opt was run -vectorize > -unroll-allow-partial -O3 with no other optimization flags (the patch > adds the -vectorize option). And opt had also been given the flag: -bb-vectorize-vector-bits=256 -Hal > llc was just given -O3. &...
2013 Sep 04
6
[LLVMdev] Aliasing of volatile and non-volatile
...n 3 .L4: movl (%rsi), %edi addl $1, %ecx addl %r8d, %edi addl %edi, %eax cmpl %edx, %ecx jne .L4 .L3: rep ret .cfi_endproc .LFE0: .size foo, .-foo .ident "GCC: (Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5) 4.4.3" .section .note.GNU-stack,"", at progbits The specifics in our case were that the AliasSetTracker indicated mod/ref for all pointers in the loop, where one of them was used in a volatile load, and all others were used in non-volatile loads. As a result, t...
2011 Oct 23
0
[LLVMdev] build warnings
Hi, I haven't seen those errors. Clang and LLVM both build with no warnings on the 3 versions of GCC I test with. MSVC reports loads of warnings however. Cheers, James ________________________________________ From: Csaba Raduly [rcsaba at gmail.com] Sent: 23 October 2011 18:44 To: James Molloy Cc: Paul Berube; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] build warnings On Sat, Oct 22,
2013 Sep 07
0
[LLVMdev] Aliasing of volatile and non-volatile
...addl $1, %ecx > addl %r8d, %edi > addl %edi, %eax > cmpl %edx, %ecx > jne .L4 > .L3: > rep > ret > .cfi_endproc > .LFE0: > .size foo, .-foo > .ident "GCC: (Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5) 4.4.3" > .section .note.GNU-stack,"", at progbits > > > The specifics in our case were that the AliasSetTracker indicated mod/ref > for all pointers in the loop, where one of them was used in a volatile > load, and all others were used in non-volatil...
2011 Jul 18
0
[LLVMdev] [compiler-rt] trunk fails ctest on X86_64 Linux
....c: In function ‘main’: /home/taylorh/prog/compiler-rt/test/Unit/powitf2_test.c:229: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘printf’ /home/taylorh/prog/compiler-rt/test/Unit/powitf2_test.c:229: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘printf’ I am building with gcc 4.4.3-4ubuntu5, though I doubt that matters. I have tried building with a release build of clang 2.9 (trunk 115910) and the errors are identical. The following lines of output seem relevant. They all come from the following pastebin http://pastebin.com/YJDEr4bY ~~~~~headers not found during cmake~~~~~ ~~~~~Note...
2011 Mar 01
14
virt-manager 0.8.2 local ISO and PXE boot install option greyed out on 2.6.32.27 pv-ops Dom0 kernel
Hi, I just installed a pv-ops Dom0 2.6.32.27 Kernel on a 64 bit non VT machine. Following instructions here http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/Xen4.0 for 64 bit Ubuntu 10.04 apt-get install bcc bin86 gawk bridge-utils iproute libcurl3 libcurl4-openssl-dev bzip2 module-init-tools transfig tgif texinfo texlive-latex-base texlive-latex-recommended texlive-fonts-extra texlive-fonts-recommended
2011 Oct 29
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
...e good enough for > > > discussion. > > > > > > I'm using LLVM head r143101, with the attached patch applied, and clang > > > head r143100 on an x86_64 machine (some kind of Intel Xeon). For the gcc > > > comparison, I'm using build Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5. gcc was run -O3 > > > without any other optimization flags. opt was run -vectorize > > > -unroll-allow-partial -O3 with no other optimization flags (the patch > > > adds the -vectorize option). > > > > And opt had also been given the flag: -bb-vectorize-vect...
2011 Oct 29
4
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
...etc.). But they should be good enough for > > discussion. > > > > I'm using LLVM head r143101, with the attached patch applied, and clang > > head r143100 on an x86_64 machine (some kind of Intel Xeon). For the gcc > > comparison, I'm using build Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5. gcc was run -O3 > > without any other optimization flags. opt was run -vectorize > > -unroll-allow-partial -O3 with no other optimization flags (the patch > > adds the -vectorize option). > > And opt had also been given the flag: -bb-vectorize-vector-bits=256 And this was...
2011 Feb 09
8
reboot after "scrubbing free ram"
Hello, I have some diagnostic Info for you. Tried to get xen-4.0.1 working on another node of my cluster. Only difference: Newer revision of the Hardware. Exactly same Software Stack. Stack: Ubuntu Lucid 64bit, xen-4.0.1 from Source, selfbuilt linux-2.6.32.27 from xen/stable-2.6.32.x Nodes working: HP DL380G5 16GB (Intel X5460) Node not working: HP DL380G6 16GB (Intel X5550) Effect: Xen
2011 Aug 08
1
libguestfs-test-tool on ubuntu: kernel panic
...=1 TERM=rxvt ' \ -drive file=/var/tmp/.guestfs-88619/root.32581,snapshot=on,if=virtio,cache=unsafe [ 0.000000] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset [ 0.000000] Initializing cgroup subsys cpu [ 0.000000] Linux version 2.6.32-redacted-generic (redacated) (gcc version 4.4.3 (Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5) ) #redacted-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 24 05:09:12 PDT 2011 (Ubuntu 2.6.32-redacted-generic 2.6.32.38+drm33.16) [ 0.000000] Command line: panic=1 console=ttyS0 udevtimeout=300 noapic acpi=off printk.time=1 cgroup_disable=memory selinux=0 guestfs_verbose=1 TERM=rxvt [ 0.000000] KERNEL supported cpus:...