search for: 4ll

...;4 + -8LL < 0". OpenCL C, and in turn SPIR, defines sizeof(int) == 4. While this might be a problem in C, this isn't an issue in OpenCL since there is no variance in the sizeof(int) across devices. I think you're still misunderstanding. If size_t is 32 bits, sizeof(int) + -8LL is -4LL, so the comparison produces true. If it's 64 bits, the -8LL promotes to an unsigned long long, sizeof(int) + -8LL is 18446744073709551612ULL, the 0 promotes to 0ULL, and the comparison produces false. [Villmow, Micah] I see now, I think you had a type-o in the previous email, "sizeof(sizeo...

...lt; 0". OpenCL C, and in turn SPIR, defines sizeof(int) == 4. While this > might be a problem in C, this isn't an issue in OpenCL since there is no > variance in the sizeof(int) across devices. I think you're still misunderstanding. If size_t is 32 bits, sizeof(int) + -8LL is -4LL, so the comparison produces true. If it's 64 bits, the -8LL promotes to an unsigned long long, sizeof(int) + -8LL is 18446744073709551612ULL, the 0 promotes to 0ULL, and the comparison produces false. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lis...

...this > might > > be a problem in C, this isn't an issue in OpenCL since there is no > variance > > in the sizeof(int) across devices. > > > > > > > > I think you're still misunderstanding. If size_t is 32 bits, > sizeof(int) + > > -8LL is -4LL, so the comparison produces true. If it's 64 bits, the - > 8LL > > promotes to an unsigned long long, sizeof(int) + -8LL is > > 18446744073709551612ULL, the 0 promotes to 0ULL, and the comparison > produces > > false. > > > > [Villmow, Micah] I see now, I thi...

> -----Original Message----- > From: Eli Friedman [mailto:eli.friedman at gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 3:22 PM > To: Villmow, Micah > Cc: Richard Smith; cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] [LLVMdev] SPIR Portability Discussion > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Villmow, Micah <Micah.Villmow at amd.com> >

...and in turn SPIR, defines sizeof(int) == 4. While this might > be a problem in C, this isn't an issue in OpenCL since there is no variance > in the sizeof(int) across devices. > > > > I think you're still misunderstanding. If size_t is 32 bits, sizeof(int) + > -8LL is -4LL, so the comparison produces true. If it's 64 bits, the -8LL > promotes to an unsigned long long, sizeof(int) + -8LL is > 18446744073709551612ULL, the 0 promotes to 0ULL, and the comparison produces > false. > > [Villmow, Micah] I see now, I think you had a type-o in the previous...

...n SPIR, defines sizeof(int) == 4. While this > might be a problem in C, this isn't an issue in OpenCL since there is no > variance in the sizeof(int) across devices.**** > > ** ** > > I think you're still misunderstanding. If size_t is 32 bits, sizeof(int) + > -8LL is -4LL, so the comparison produces true. If it's 64 bits, the -8LL > promotes to an unsigned long long, sizeof(int) + -8LL > is 18446744073709551612ULL, the 0 promotes to 0ULL, and the comparison > produces false.**** > > *[Villmow, Micah] I see now, I think you had a type-o in the prev...

...problem in C, this isn't an issue in OpenCL since there is no >> variance >> > in the sizeof(int) across devices. >> > >> > >> > >> > I think you're still misunderstanding. If size_t is 32 bits, >> sizeof(int) + >> > -8LL is -4LL, so the comparison produces true. If it's 64 bits, the - >> 8LL >> > promotes to an unsigned long long, sizeof(int) + -8LL is >> > 18446744073709551612ULL, the 0 promotes to 0ULL, and the comparison >> produces >> > false. >> > >> > [Vill...

...a secs:6 flags:0x8000 Y:172.20.32.249 S:172.20.32.5 ether 0:1:3:c3:4d:1a sname "imgpc143" vend-rfc1048 DHCP:OFFER SID:172.20.32.5 LT:86400 SM:255.255.255.0 [tos 0x10] 0x0000 4510 0148 0000 0000 1011 dd7c ac14 2005 E..H.......|.... 0x0010 ffff ffff 0043 0044 0134 6c4c 0201 0600 .....C.D.4lL.... 0x0020 05c3 4d1a 0006 8000 0000 0000 ac14 20f9 ..M............. 0x0030 ac14 2005 0000 0000 0001 03c3 4d1a 0000 ............M... 0x0040 0000 0000 0000 0000 696d 6770 6331 3433 ........imgpc143 0x0050 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ................ 0x0060 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 00...

Hola, I've done everything as correct as I can see in smb.conf under fresh ubuntu 6.06 fully updated install to have it run as a PDC on hostname florentine, domain DAVEYST. There are no testparm errors. I've added users with useradd and smbpasswd -a I've added machines with useradd and smbpasswd -a -m I can see the server in my network neighbourhood and access/browse folders on