search for: 4df33089b46f

...drm instead. Applied to for-next/hardening, thanks! [1/9] drm/amd/pm: Annotate struct smu10_voltage_dependency_table with __counted_by https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/a6046ac659d6 [2/9] drm/amdgpu/discovery: Annotate struct ip_hw_instance with __counted_by https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/4df33089b46f [3/9] drm/i915/selftests: Annotate struct perf_series with __counted_by https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/ffd3f823bdf6 [4/9] drm/msm/dpu: Annotate struct dpu_hw_intr with __counted_by https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/2de35a989b76 [5/9] drm/nouveau/pm: Annotate struct nvkm_perfdom with __counte...

...drm instead. Applied to for-next/hardening, thanks! [1/9] drm/amd/pm: Annotate struct smu10_voltage_dependency_table with __counted_by https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/a6046ac659d6 [2/9] drm/amdgpu/discovery: Annotate struct ip_hw_instance with __counted_by https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/4df33089b46f [3/9] drm/i915/selftests: Annotate struct perf_series with __counted_by https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/ffd3f823bdf6 [4/9] drm/msm/dpu: Annotate struct dpu_hw_intr with __counted_by https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/2de35a989b76 [5/9] drm/nouveau/pm: Annotate struct nvkm_perfdom with __counte...

...drm instead. Applied to for-next/hardening, thanks! [1/9] drm/amd/pm: Annotate struct smu10_voltage_dependency_table with __counted_by https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/a6046ac659d6 [2/9] drm/amdgpu/discovery: Annotate struct ip_hw_instance with __counted_by https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/4df33089b46f [3/9] drm/i915/selftests: Annotate struct perf_series with __counted_by https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/ffd3f823bdf6 [4/9] drm/msm/dpu: Annotate struct dpu_hw_intr with __counted_by https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/2de35a989b76 [5/9] drm/nouveau/pm: Annotate struct nvkm_perfdom with __counte...

...ng upstream if it's already on it's way. And because of those reasons I strongly think that patches like this should go through the DRM tree :) Regards, Christian. > [2/9] drm/amdgpu/discovery: Annotate struct ip_hw_instance with __counted_by > https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/4df33089b46f > [3/9] drm/i915/selftests: Annotate struct perf_series with __counted_by > https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/ffd3f823bdf6 > [4/9] drm/msm/dpu: Annotate struct dpu_hw_intr with __counted_by > https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/2de35a989b76 > [5/9] drm/nouveau/pm: Annotate struct...

...ng upstream if it's already on it's way. And because of those reasons I strongly think that patches like this should go through the DRM tree :) Regards, Christian. > [2/9] drm/amdgpu/discovery: Annotate struct ip_hw_instance with __counted_by > https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/4df33089b46f > [3/9] drm/i915/selftests: Annotate struct perf_series with __counted_by > https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/ffd3f823bdf6 > [4/9] drm/msm/dpu: Annotate struct dpu_hw_intr with __counted_by > https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/2de35a989b76 > [5/9] drm/nouveau/pm: Annotate struct...

...ng upstream if it's already on it's way. And because of those reasons I strongly think that patches like this should go through the DRM tree :) Regards, Christian. > [2/9] drm/amdgpu/discovery: Annotate struct ip_hw_instance with __counted_by > https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/4df33089b46f > [3/9] drm/i915/selftests: Annotate struct perf_series with __counted_by > https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/ffd3f823bdf6 > [4/9] drm/msm/dpu: Annotate struct dpu_hw_intr with __counted_by > https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/2de35a989b76 > [5/9] drm/nouveau/pm: Annotate struct...

...;s way. > > And because of those reasons I strongly think that patches like this > should go through the DRM tree :) > > Regards, > Christian. > > > [2/9] drm/amdgpu/discovery: Annotate struct ip_hw_instance with __counted_by > > https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/4df33089b46f > > [3/9] drm/i915/selftests: Annotate struct perf_series with __counted_by > > https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/ffd3f823bdf6 > > [4/9] drm/msm/dpu: Annotate struct dpu_hw_intr with __counted_by > > https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/2de35a989b76 > > [5/9] drm/no...

...;s way. > > And because of those reasons I strongly think that patches like this > should go through the DRM tree :) > > Regards, > Christian. > > > [2/9] drm/amdgpu/discovery: Annotate struct ip_hw_instance with __counted_by > > https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/4df33089b46f > > [3/9] drm/i915/selftests: Annotate struct perf_series with __counted_by > > https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/ffd3f823bdf6 > > [4/9] drm/msm/dpu: Annotate struct dpu_hw_intr with __counted_by > > https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/2de35a989b76 > > [5/9] drm/no...

...;s way. > > And because of those reasons I strongly think that patches like this > should go through the DRM tree :) > > Regards, > Christian. > > > [2/9] drm/amdgpu/discovery: Annotate struct ip_hw_instance with __counted_by > > https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/4df33089b46f > > [3/9] drm/i915/selftests: Annotate struct perf_series with __counted_by > > https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/ffd3f823bdf6 > > [4/9] drm/msm/dpu: Annotate struct dpu_hw_intr with __counted_by > > https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/2de35a989b76 > > [5/9] drm/no...

...please let me know. It was others Acked/etc. Who should carry these patches? Thanks! -Kees > > > > Regards, > > Christian. > > > > > [2/9] drm/amdgpu/discovery: Annotate struct ip_hw_instance with __counted_by > > > https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/4df33089b46f > > > [3/9] drm/i915/selftests: Annotate struct perf_series with __counted_by > > > https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/ffd3f823bdf6 > > > [4/9] drm/msm/dpu: Annotate struct dpu_hw_intr with __counted_by > > > https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/2de35a989b76 &g...

...please let me know. It was others Acked/etc. Who should carry these patches? Thanks! -Kees > > > > Regards, > > Christian. > > > > > [2/9] drm/amdgpu/discovery: Annotate struct ip_hw_instance with __counted_by > > > https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/4df33089b46f > > > [3/9] drm/i915/selftests: Annotate struct perf_series with __counted_by > > > https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/ffd3f823bdf6 > > > [4/9] drm/msm/dpu: Annotate struct dpu_hw_intr with __counted_by > > > https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/2de35a989b76 &g...

...please let me know. It was others Acked/etc. Who should carry these patches? Thanks! -Kees > > > > Regards, > > Christian. > > > > > [2/9] drm/amdgpu/discovery: Annotate struct ip_hw_instance with __counted_by > > > https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/4df33089b46f > > > [3/9] drm/i915/selftests: Annotate struct perf_series with __counted_by > > > https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/ffd3f823bdf6 > > > [4/9] drm/msm/dpu: Annotate struct dpu_hw_intr with __counted_by > > > https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/2de35a989b76 &g...

...the confusion came from. Regards, Christian. > > Thanks! > > -Kees > > >>> Regards, >>> Christian. >>> >>>> [2/9] drm/amdgpu/discovery: Annotate struct ip_hw_instance with __counted_by >>>> https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/4df33089b46f >>>> [3/9] drm/i915/selftests: Annotate struct perf_series with __counted_by >>>> https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/ffd3f823bdf6 >>>> [4/9] drm/msm/dpu: Annotate struct dpu_hw_intr with __counted_by >>>> https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/2de35...

...the confusion came from. Regards, Christian. > > Thanks! > > -Kees > > >>> Regards, >>> Christian. >>> >>>> [2/9] drm/amdgpu/discovery: Annotate struct ip_hw_instance with __counted_by >>>> https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/4df33089b46f >>>> [3/9] drm/i915/selftests: Annotate struct perf_series with __counted_by >>>> https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/ffd3f823bdf6 >>>> [4/9] drm/msm/dpu: Annotate struct dpu_hw_intr with __counted_by >>>> https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/2de35...

...the confusion came from. Regards, Christian. > > Thanks! > > -Kees > > >>> Regards, >>> Christian. >>> >>>> [2/9] drm/amdgpu/discovery: Annotate struct ip_hw_instance with __counted_by >>>> https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/4df33089b46f >>>> [3/9] drm/i915/selftests: Annotate struct perf_series with __counted_by >>>> https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/ffd3f823bdf6 >>>> [4/9] drm/msm/dpu: Annotate struct dpu_hw_intr with __counted_by >>>> https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/2de35...

Hi, This is a batch of patches touching drm for preparing for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS (for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family functions). As found with Coccinelle[1], add

Hi, This is a batch of patches touching drm for preparing for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS (for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family functions). As found with Coccinelle[1], add

Hi, This is a batch of patches touching drm for preparing for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by attribute. Flexible array members annotated with __counted_by can have their accesses bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS (for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family functions). As found with Coccinelle[1], add