Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "4db50466".
2004 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] Re: LLVM Compiler Infrastructure Tutorial
Yiping,
Could you describe in a little more detail what your goals are? I
agree with Reid and Misha that modifying the instruction definition is
usually not advisable but to suggest alternatives, we would need to
know more. Also, for some projects it could make sense to change the
instruction set.
--Vikram
http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/~vadve
http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/
On Oct 20, 2004, at 2:41 PM,
2004 Oct 20
2
[LLVMdev] Re: LLVM Compiler Infrastructure Tutorial
On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 11:59:45AM -0700, Yiping Fan wrote:
> Yeah. We need to have more extra fields in the instruction. Fo
> example, during high-level synthesis, we must schedule an instruction
> to a certain control step (or cycle), and bind it to be execute on a
> certain functional unit, etc.
Since we're talking about "execution" and "scheduling", you
2004 Oct 20
2
[LLVMdev] Re: LLVM Compiler Infrastructure Tutorial
...________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20041020/4db50466/attachment.html>