Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "4d84319b".
2011 Sep 14
1
[LLVMdev] Fwd: LLVM IR Branchs
...>> --
>> *Rafael Parizi*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Rafael Parizi*
>
>
>
>
--
*Rafael Parizi*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110914/4d84319b/attachment.html>
2011 Sep 14
0
[LLVMdev] Fwd: LLVM IR Branchs
Hello,
I created a new block for execution to continue, but I got the case in which
a statement defined in a block is used in another, not dominate all uses.
For example:
entry:
%n_addr = alloca i32, align 4
%retval = alloca i32
%"alloca point" = bitcast i32 0 to i32
store i32 %n, i32* %n_addr
%0 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* noalias getelementptr inbounds ([20
x i8]*
2011 Sep 06
2
[LLVMdev] Fwd: LLVM IR Branchs
Ok! I do understand.
Thanks by help!
2011/9/5 Justin Holewinski <justin.holewinski at gmail.com>
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Rafael Baldiati Parizi <
> parizi.computacao at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes, that's how I'm doing now ... create a new block where the execution
>> flow will continue after the shift, following the basics of basic blocks.