Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "4d4".
Did you mean:
4d
2018 Dec 24
1
NT_STATUS_NETWORK_SESSION_EXPIRED Domain member
...mp;24Q%/2(O=&UP+W-A;6)A+7=A=&-H9&]G+B0D(@I$045-3TY3
M/2)W:6YB:6YD9"(*05542$9)3$4](B]L:74O971C+W-A;6)A+7=A=&-H9&]G
M+FEN:2(*0T]2141)4CTB+W9A<B]C;W)E<R(*3$]#2T9)3$4](B]V87(O<G5N
M+W-A;6)A+7=A=&-H9&]G+FQO8VLB"E-%4E9%4CTB8'5N86UE("UN8"(*4TA!
M4D4](B(*"E9%4D)/4T4];F\*5$E-14]55#TQ-0I$4EE254X];F\*1T-/4D4]
M;F\*4TQ%15`]-0I,3T-+140];F\*"@IU<V%G92 at I('L*8V%T(#P\14]&"E5S
M86=E.B`D,"!;/&]P=&EO;G,^72!;/'-H87)E/ET*"D]P=&EO;G,Z"B`@("UH
M?"TM:&5L<"`@("`@("`@(&quo...
2018 Dec 17
6
NT_STATUS_NETWORK_SESSION_EXPIRED Domain member
All,
using Samba as an AD (2k12) domain member in Stretch
(2:4.5.12+dfsg-2+deb9u4) with tdb as default and rid as domain backend.
No overlapping. Everything works fine. Setup was done as in the wiki
[1].
If you're connecting from a Windows 10 client and do not add
dedicated keytab file = /etc/krb5.keytab
kerberos method = secrets and keytab
winbind refresh tickets = Yes
to
2001 May 04
1
LVM 0.9.1beta7 and ext3 0.0.6b
...;start_this_handle+307/3a8>
Trace; c015caa3 <journal_start+77/a0>
Trace; c0152986 <ext3_notify_change+14a/360>
Trace; c0120176 <do_generic_file_read+8d2/8e0>
Trace; c0139638 <notify_change+40/64>
Trace; c0129067 <do_truncate+5f/ac>
Trace; c01329bc <open_namei+474/4d4>
Trace; c0129e40 <filp_open+44/f8>
Trace; c012a08e <sys_open+36/94>
Trace; c010a034 <system_call+34/38>
Code; c012c25f <refile_buffer+17/d0>
00000000 <_EIP>:
Code; c012c25f <refile_buffer+17/d0> <=====
0: c6 05 00 00 00 00 00 movb $0x0,0x0...
2007 Apr 30
0
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
...5f je 531 <__FUNCTION__.21806+0x11>
> - 4d2: 72 65 jb 539 <__FUNCTION__.21806+0x19>
> + 4d0: 74 5f je 531 <__FUNCTION__.21719+0x11>
> + 4d2: 72 65 jb 539 <__FUNCTION__.21719+0x19>
> 4d4: 66 data16
> ...
>
> -000004e0 <__FUNCTION__.21966>:
> +000004e0 <__FUNCTION__.21879>:
> 4e0: 61 popa
> 4e1: 64 fs
> 4e2: 6a 75 push $0x75
> - 4e4: 73 74 jae 55a...
2007 Apr 27
2
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
The saga continues.
I've been tracking the interface changes and merging them with
the refactoring work I'm doing. I got as far as building stage3
of llvm-gcc but the object files from stage2 and stage3 differ:
warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs
warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs
(Are the above two ok?)
The list below is clearly bad. I think it's every object file in
the
2008 Jun 30
4
Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
Hello list.
I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without
modifications.
How did I try it?
Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock )
Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a
rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee
prep-out.log
The build failed at the end:
Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL
Checking