search for: 4cfa6257

Hi Anton, On 17/07/12 15:35, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: >> actually there is a different fix, which is to not pay any attention to GCC >> function types when generating calls (and function prototypes), and instead >> do everything by querying GCC's CUMULATIVE_ARGS. > I tried to do this during llvm-gcc times and it turned out that there > might be different calls with

> actually there is a different fix, which is to not pay any attention to GCC > function types when generating calls (and function prototypes), and instead > do everything by querying GCC's CUMULATIVE_ARGS. I tried to do this during llvm-gcc times and it turned out that there might be different calls with different signatures in single module e.g. function with N arguments is called

...l the details now though... >> > > yes, it is a can of worms, but I'm hopeful it can be made to work anyway. > > Ciao, Duncan. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120717/4cfa6257/attachment.html>