Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "4be".
Did you mean:
4b
2007 Feb 01
2
strange caller display
...01.0.224>.
Content-Length: 0.
.
#
U 10.90.1.1:5060 -> 10.201.0.224:5060
SIP/2.0 100 Trying.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.201.0.224:5060;branch=z9hG4bK58131be0;rport.
From: "angry boy" <sip:9000220002@10.201.0.224>;tag=as4cda057e.
To: <sip:96085236418505@10.30.0.215>;tag=6F2C11DC-4BE.
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 06:32:57 GMT.
Call-ID: 5ce953af380a92bc4a9fb8871e9e0136@10.201.0.224.
Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x.
CSeq: 102 INVITE.
Allow-Events: telephone-event.
Content-Length: 0.
.
#
U 10.90.1.1:5060 -> 10.201.0.224:5060
SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.201.0....
2007 Apr 30
0
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
...44e: 70 00 jo 450 <__FUNCTION__.21236>
>
> -00000450 <__FUNCTION__.21323>:
> +00000450 <__FUNCTION__.21236>:
> 450: 66 69 6e 64 5f 62 imul $0x625f,0x64(%esi),%bp
> 456: 61 popa
> 457: 73 65 jae 4be <.str5+0xf>
> 459: 5f pop %edi
> - 45a: 74 65 je 4c1 <__FUNCTION__.21932+0x2>
> - 45c: 72 6d jb 4cb <__FUNCTION__.21932+0xc>
> + 45a: 74 65 je 4c1 <__FUNCTION__.21845+0x2>
> +...
2007 Apr 27
2
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
The saga continues.
I've been tracking the interface changes and merging them with
the refactoring work I'm doing. I got as far as building stage3
of llvm-gcc but the object files from stage2 and stage3 differ:
warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs
warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs
(Are the above two ok?)
The list below is clearly bad. I think it's every object file in
the
2017 Feb 18
8
[PATCH 0/6] generator: Split up generator/actions.ml
Split up the huge generator/actions.ml into several smaller files.
Rich.