Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "4b5da48".
2013 Jul 08
2
[PATCH] virtio-spec: add field for scsi command size
...t 30. Here's the kernel patch:
virtio: VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT feature
Also known as the "no really, I read the spec" bit.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h
index b7cda39..4b5da48 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h
@@ -51,4 +51,7 @@
* suppressed them? */
#define VIRTIO_F_NOTIFY_ON_EMPTY 24
+/* Can the device handle any descriptor layout? */
+#define VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT 30
+
#endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_VIRTIO_CONFIG_H */
2013 Jul 08
2
[PATCH] virtio-spec: add field for scsi command size
...t 30. Here's the kernel patch:
virtio: VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT feature
Also known as the "no really, I read the spec" bit.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h
index b7cda39..4b5da48 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h
@@ -51,4 +51,7 @@
* suppressed them? */
#define VIRTIO_F_NOTIFY_ON_EMPTY 24
+/* Can the device handle any descriptor layout? */
+#define VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT 30
+
#endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_VIRTIO_CONFIG_H */
2013 Jul 08
0
[PATCH] virtio-spec: add field for scsi command size
...sell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au>
This is already used in qemu:
/* A guest should never accept this. It implies negotiation is broken. */
#define VIRTIO_F_BAD_FEATURE 30
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h
> index b7cda39..4b5da48 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h
> @@ -51,4 +51,7 @@
> * suppressed them? */
> #define VIRTIO_F_NOTIFY_ON_EMPTY 24
>
> +/* Can the device handle any descriptor layout? */
> +#define VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT 30
>...
2013 Jul 04
2
[PATCH] virtio-spec: add field for scsi command size
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 03:34:09PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com> writes:
> > Il 01/07/2013 01:47, Rusty Russell ha scritto:
> >> > >
> >> > > Mainly because I'm not sure that *all* devices are now safe. Are they?
> >> >
> >> > virtio-scsi's implementation in QEMU is not safe (been
2013 Jul 04
2
[PATCH] virtio-spec: add field for scsi command size
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 03:34:09PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com> writes:
> > Il 01/07/2013 01:47, Rusty Russell ha scritto:
> >> > >
> >> > > Mainly because I'm not sure that *all* devices are now safe. Are they?
> >> >
> >> > virtio-scsi's implementation in QEMU is not safe (been