Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "4ab3d349".
Did you mean:
0abd349
2010 Sep 30
0
[LLVMdev] Associating types directly with debug metadata?
>>>> We want to avoid any Type class modification. Instead you can use pair in named metadata to match metadata with type.
>>>>
>>
>> I thought about that more, and I think the "right" way would be to have a syntax like
>>
>> !21 = metadata !{ type %struct.T, metadata !11 }
>>
>> or perhaps
>>
>> !21 = metadata
2010 Sep 30
3
[LLVMdev] Associating types directly with debug metadata?
On Sep 30, 2010, at 1:30 AM, Pekka Nikander wrote:
>>>> Would the right starting point be to simply add an MDNode pointer to the Type class? That should be then convertible to a DIType?
>>>
>>> We want to avoid any Type class modification. Instead you can use pair in named metadata to match metadata with type.
>>>
>>> !11 = metadata !{i32