Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "4a83".
Did you mean:
483
2017 Apr 21
1
NT_STATUS_NO_LOGON_SERVERS after removing a DC and WERR_BADFILE when trying to remove broken DC
On 2017-04-20 18:38, Rowland Penny wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 18:00:24 +0200
> Sven Schwedas via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
>> On 2017-04-07 13:44, Sven Schwedas via samba wrote:
>>> In the end I just upgraded all DCs to 4.5 and remote-deleted the
>>> broken ones. Seemed to work without a hitch, manual removal was
>>> only necessary
2017 Mar 29
5
NT_STATUS_NO_LOGON_SERVERS after removing a DC and WERR_BADFILE when trying to remove broken DC
Situation: Trying to upgrade Samba from 4.1 to 4.5 without disruption
too much by adding new DCs and demoting old ones.
After bringing online the first 4.5 DC, I ran `demote
--remove-other-dead-server=` on that DC to remove one of the old 4.1 DCs
(held no FSMO roles). That seemed to run fine (the DC had been offline
for a few weeks at that point and I didn't want to restore it just for
2009 Sep 11
1
authenticating IIS 6.0 against samba?
...n. I'd like to have IIS
6.0 on the 2k3 server authenticating against samba so that windows
sharepoint services can be used. I've tried getting NTLM authentication
working following instructions at
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/WindowsServer2003/Library/IIS/7258232a-5e16-4a83-b76e-11e07c3f2615.mspx?mfr=true
but I'm not having hany luck. I'm still getting access denied errors
when trying to authenticate users in sharepoint services. Has any one
got this working, and if so, any tips?
2013 Oct 07
0
rails_admin problem in raoutes, parallel login area in devise
...end an email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/0e874a12-4a83-488f-b983-682ad85c63c9%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
2017 Sep 08
2
Server GC/name.dom/dom is not registered with our KDC: Miscellaneous failure (see text): Server (GC/name/dom@DOM) unknown
..., this one, track down both uuid's, checkout which
> which hostname
> >>> belongs with these.
> >>
> >> Going by the output of `samba-tool drs showrepl` and sam.ldb, the
> >> GUIDs are as follows:
> >>
> >> graz-dc-sem 160f5a53-5c29-4a83-aeee-6cb1dbabeed7
> >> graz-dc-bis 7e4973ba-4093-4523-a70f-7caa4845e34d
> (not in sam.ldb)
> >> graz-dc-1b bcffbad8-1add-46b9-bf69-90e52c0f09ea
> >> villach-dc-sem eb5f9772-cd8f-4cde-9629-f1898c94aedd
> >> villach-dc-bis e1569c90-50f9-4bb5-bd85-79145e3ff6fd
&...
2017 Sep 06
6
Server GC/name.dom/dom is not registered with our KDC: Miscellaneous failure (see text): Server (GC/name/dom@DOM) unknown
Hai Sven,
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Sven Schwedas [mailto:sven.schwedas at tao.at]
> Verzonden: dinsdag 5 september 2017 17:13
> Aan: L.P.H. van Belle
> CC: samba at lists.samba.org
> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Server GC/name.dom/dom is not
> registered with our KDC: Miscellaneous failure (see text):
> Server (GC/name/dom at DOM) unknown
>
> On
2017 Sep 08
0
Server GC/name.dom/dom is not registered with our KDC: Miscellaneous failure (see text): Server (GC/name/dom@DOM) unknown
...ts.samba.org/archive/samba/2017-March/207429.html
> > Ok, this one, track down both uuid's, checkout which which
> hostname belongs with these.
>
> Going by the output of `samba-tool drs showrepl` and sam.ldb,
> the GUIDs are as follows:
>
> graz-dc-sem 160f5a53-5c29-4a83-aeee-6cb1dbabeed7
> graz-dc-bis 7e4973ba-4093-4523-a70f-7caa4845e34d (not in sam.ldb)
> graz-dc-1b bcffbad8-1add-46b9-bf69-90e52c0f09ea
> villach-dc-sem eb5f9772-cd8f-4cde-9629-f1898c94aedd
> villach-dc-bis e1569c90-50f9-4bb5-bd85-79145e3ff6fd
>
> villach-sem/bis want to replicat...
2017 Sep 05
3
Server GC/name.dom/dom is not registered with our KDC: Miscellaneous failure (see text): Server (GC/name/dom@DOM) unknown
Today's episode of "why is AD break", brought to you by:
> [2017/09/05 10:17:06.015617, 3] ../source4/auth/gensec/gensec_gssapi.c:613(gensec_gssapi_update)
> Server GC/graz-dc-1b.ad.tao.at/ad.tao.at is not registered with our KDC: Miscellaneous failure (see text): Server (GC/graz-dc-1b.ad.tao.at/ad.tao.at at AD.TAO.AT) unknown
> [2017/09/05 10:17:06.015717, 0]
2019 May 21
1
Debugging Samba is a total PITA and this needs to improve
Hai,
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Sven
> Schwedas via samba
> Verzonden: dinsdag 21 mei 2019 16:44
> Aan: samba at lists.samba.org
> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Debugging Samba is a total PITA and
> this needs to improve
>
> On 21.05.19 16:15, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote:
> >> Since Cyrus
2017 Sep 11
0
Server GC/name.dom/dom is not registered with our KDC: Miscellaneous failure (see text): Server (GC/name/dom@DOM) unknown
...n both uuid's, checkout which
>> which hostname
>>>>> belongs with these.
>>>>
>>>> Going by the output of `samba-tool drs showrepl` and sam.ldb,
>>>> the GUIDs are as follows:
>>>>
>>>> graz-dc-sem 160f5a53-5c29-4a83-aeee-6cb1dbabeed7 graz-dc-bis
>>>> 7e4973ba-4093-4523-a70f-7caa4845e34d
>> (not in sam.ldb)
>>>> graz-dc-1b bcffbad8-1add-46b9-bf69-90e52c0f09ea villach-dc-sem
>>>> eb5f9772-cd8f-4cde-9629-f1898c94aedd villach-dc-bis
>>>> e1569c90-50f9-4bb5-bd85...
2011 Jun 30
0
help with interpreting what nnet() output gives:
...f function from above needs to be closed
}
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
------------------------------
Message: 82
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:38:32 -0700
From: Edgar Alminar <eaalminar at ucsd.edu>
To: r-help at r-project.org
Subject: [R] Sum Question
Message-ID: <C3B8C5EE-975E-4A83-9966-9C41F5A827F9 at ucsd.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hello,
I have the following dataset (this is a piece of a much larger set):
RID SCRNO VISCODE RECNO CONTTIME
23 18 HBA0190012 bl 1 5
24 18 HBA0190012 bl 3 5
28 18 HBA019...