search for: 4a0

Displaying 12 results from an estimated 12 matches for "4a0".

Did you mean: 440
2016 Nov 16
6
[SPARC]: leon2 and leon3: not respecting delayed-write to Y-register
...(There is the Filler-pass, is this the right one?) --- Code example: clang compiles the following c-code: int main(void) { int *a = (int *) 0x80000000; int *b = (int *) 0x80000004; return *a / *b; } to [...] 49c: b5 3e 60 1f sra %i1, 0x1f, %i2 4a0: 81 80 00 1a wr %i2, %y 4a4: b0 7e 40 18 sdiv %i1, %i0, %i0 4a8: 81 c7 e0 08 ret gcc does: [...] 4a0: 87 38 60 1f sra %g1, 0x1f, %g3 4a4: 81 80 e0 00 wr %g3, %y 4a8: 01 00 00 00 nop 4ac: 01 00 00 00 nop 4b0: 01 00 00 00 nop 4b...
1998 Nov 24
1
printers.def
Hello ! I am sure this has been posted before but I can not find it. I have used a file to check witch files a .inf file shall use. This util was very good to have when making a printers.def file. My problem is that I can not find the file anymore and I do not know the name of it. Thanks, /Mikael
2016 Apr 03
3
PA-RISC (hppa) video cards init failure loading the device driver kernel module
...ory at exit: 0 kiB [ 48.612000] [TTM] Zone dma32: Used memory at exit: 0 kiB [ 48.676000] [drm] radeon: ttm finalized [ 48.724000] [drm] Forcing AGP to PCI mode Starting File System Check on /d[ 48.872000] [drm] Generation 2 PCI interface, using max accessible memory ev/...2-638b-4a0[ 48.968000] radeon 0000:80:00.0: VRAM: 128M 0xFFFFFFFFC0000000 - 0xFFFFFFFFC7FFFFFF (128M used) c-be55-7444e126d[ 49.088000] radeon 0000:80:00.0: GTT: 512M 0xFFFFFFFFA0000000 - 0xFFFFFFFFBFFFFFFF 283... [ 49.196000] [drm] Detected VRAM RAM=128M, BAR=128M [ 49.264000] [drm] RAM width 128bits...
2016 Apr 04
1
PA-RISC (hppa) video cards init failure loading the device driver kernel module
...dma32: Used memory at exit: 0 kiB >> [ 48.676000] [drm] radeon: ttm finalized >> [ 48.724000] [drm] Forcing AGP to PCI mode >> Starting File System Check on /d[ 48.872000] [drm] >> Generation 2 PCI interface, using max accessible memory >> ev/...2-638b-4a0[ 48.968000] radeon 0000:80:00.0: VRAM: 128M >> 0xFFFFFFFFC0000000 - 0xFFFFFFFFC7FFFFFF (128M used) >> c-be55-7444e126d[ 49.088000] radeon 0000:80:00.0: GTT: 512M >> 0xFFFFFFFFA0000000 - 0xFFFFFFFFBFFFFFFF >> 283... >> [ 49.196000] [drm] Detected VRAM RAM=128M, BA...
2016 Apr 04
0
PA-RISC (hppa) video cards init failure loading the device driver kernel module
....612000] [TTM] Zone dma32: Used memory at exit: 0 kiB > [ 48.676000] [drm] radeon: ttm finalized > [ 48.724000] [drm] Forcing AGP to PCI mode > Starting File System Check on /d[ 48.872000] [drm] > Generation 2 PCI interface, using max accessible memory > ev/...2-638b-4a0[ 48.968000] radeon 0000:80:00.0: VRAM: 128M > 0xFFFFFFFFC0000000 - 0xFFFFFFFFC7FFFFFF (128M used) > c-be55-7444e126d[ 49.088000] radeon 0000:80:00.0: GTT: 512M > 0xFFFFFFFFA0000000 - 0xFFFFFFFFBFFFFFFF > 283... > [ 49.196000] [drm] Detected VRAM RAM=128M, BAR=128M > [ 49.2...
2016 Apr 04
0
[Radeon] PA-RISC (hppa) video cards init failure loading the device driver kernel module
...at exit: 0 kiB >>> [ 48.676000] [drm] radeon: ttm finalized >>> [ 48.724000] [drm] Forcing AGP to PCI mode >>> Starting File System Check on /d[ 48.872000] [drm] >>> Generation 2 PCI interface, using max accessible memory >>> ev/...2-638b-4a0[ 48.968000] radeon 0000:80:00.0: VRAM: 128M >>> 0xFFFFFFFFC0000000 - 0xFFFFFFFFC7FFFFFF (128M used) >>> c-be55-7444e126d[ 49.088000] radeon 0000:80:00.0: GTT: 512M >>> 0xFFFFFFFFA0000000 - 0xFFFFFFFFBFFFFFFF >>> 283... >>> [ 49.196000] [drm] Detect...
2009 Apr 21
0
Unable to browse Samba share by hostname from certain clients...
...F AD 19 58 59 27 C7 2F BE 96 F0 53 02 B0 .\...XY' ./...S.. [470] D0 1B 21 90 AA BE 9E 2F DD 61 05 D7 DD B6 D4 C7 ..!..../ .a...... [480] 1A 7D B1 96 77 AA 12 13 4B 58 76 96 E2 98 5B 19 .}..w... KXv...[. [490] A2 17 4A 78 4F E0 27 F4 31 B9 E7 49 8F 4F FE CD ..JxO.'. 1..I.O.. [4A0] E8 14 C3 0A F6 4C 91 DB BE A6 7C C1 E4 B2 E3 BE .....L.. ..|..... [4B0] 32 71 B4 ED B5 7B 05 61 75 D8 47 E7 F9 2E B7 05 2q...{.a u.G..... [4C0] 23 3D DA 24 C1 76 D6 68 9D 4A 0F F8 BF 41 4D DD #=.$.v.h .J...AM. [4D0] D7 E0 A4 81 E8 30 81 E5 A0 03 02 01 17 A2 81 DD .....0.. ...........
2000 Aug 16
1
samba errormessages
...460] 03 FF 05 E1 0C FF 01 00 06 20 CC 10 08 0D 34 04 ........ . ....4. [470] 44 01 56 16 86 10 D6 06 E6 10 27 05 77 00 97 15 D.V..... ..'.w... [480] C7 04 E9 10 1B 01 EC 10 08 0F 44 17 06 03 36 00 ........ ..D...6. [490] 66 00 86 11 C6 14 17 02 98 12 F8 04 0B 01 1B 00 f....... ........ [4A0] 7B 00 AB 11 EB 01 5C 10 08 10 B4 17 06 04 16 01 {.....\. ........ [4B0] 46 30 A6 00 D6 00 37 10 77 14 F7 04 49 03 59 10 F0....7. w...I.Y. [4C0] 3A 01 EB 00 5C 10 8C 10 CC 10 08 0B 64 18 06 06 :...\... ....d... [4D0] 16 20 96 10 37 10 87 00 A7 15 E9 10 3B 01 4B 00 . ..7... ....;.K. [4E0] 1C...
2001 Jan 25
3
Samba quota 'feature' fix?
Hey Guys and Gals, I'm wondering if the quotas.c file is supposed to fix the problem where a Linux x86 system running with the quota software causes corrupt files to be written by Windows clients. I compiled it in and it didn't seem to make a difference for the following problem. In other words, if I enable quotas on my RH6.2 / 2.2.16-22 kernel box and then write a file via Samba/Windows
2007 Apr 30
0
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
...5 63 jne 501 <__FUNCTION__.22032+0x1> > - 49e: 74 5f je 4ff <__FUNCTION__.21966+0x1f> > + 49c: 75 63 jne 501 <__FUNCTION__.21945+0x1> > + 49e: 74 5f je 4ff <__FUNCTION__.21879+0x1f> > 4a0: 70 00 jo 4a2 <.str4> > > 000004a2 <.str4>: > @@ -11799,61 +11799,61 @@ > 4bd: 50 push %eax > ... > > -000004bf <__FUNCTION__.21932>: > +000004bf <__FUNCTION__.21845>: > 4bf: 64 65 63 6c 5f 66 arp...
2002 Sep 05
0
Printing to a windows printer (ERRSRV 22)
..... [460] 1F 00 F8 6D C1 01 00 F8 63 C0 01 F8 65 B1 FB 0E ...m.... c...e... [470] 01 FF 80 82 00 82 00 CD 00 03 03 FE 00 00 C1 20 ........ ....... [480] 00 F8 6D C1 01 00 F8 63 C0 01 F8 65 B1 FB 0E 01 ..m....c ...e.... [490] FF 80 82 00 82 00 CD 00 03 03 FE 00 00 C1 21 00 ........ ......!. [4A0] F8 6D C1 01 00 F8 63 C0 01 F8 65 B1 FB 0E 01 FF .m....c. ..e..... [4B0] 80 82 00 82 00 CD 00 03 03 FE 00 00 C1 22 00 F8 ........ .....".. [4C0] 6D C1 01 00 F8 63 C0 01 F8 65 B1 FB 0E 01 FF 80 m....c.. .e...... [4D0] 82 00 82 00 CD 00 03 03 FE 00 00 C1 23 00 F8 6D ........ ....#..m [4E...
2007 Apr 27
2
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
The saga continues. I've been tracking the interface changes and merging them with the refactoring work I'm doing. I got as far as building stage3 of llvm-gcc but the object files from stage2 and stage3 differ: warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs (Are the above two ok?) The list below is clearly bad. I think it's every object file in the