Displaying 12 results from an estimated 12 matches for "4a0".
Did you mean:
440
2016 Nov 16
6
[SPARC]: leon2 and leon3: not respecting delayed-write to Y-register
...(There is the Filler-pass, is this the right one?)
--- Code example:
clang compiles the following c-code:
int main(void)
{
int *a = (int *) 0x80000000;
int *b = (int *) 0x80000004;
return *a / *b;
}
to
[...]
49c: b5 3e 60 1f sra %i1, 0x1f, %i2
4a0: 81 80 00 1a wr %i2, %y
4a4: b0 7e 40 18 sdiv %i1, %i0, %i0
4a8: 81 c7 e0 08 ret
gcc does:
[...]
4a0: 87 38 60 1f sra %g1, 0x1f, %g3
4a4: 81 80 e0 00 wr %g3, %y
4a8: 01 00 00 00 nop
4ac: 01 00 00 00 nop
4b0: 01 00 00 00 nop
4b...
1998 Nov 24
1
printers.def
Hello !
I am sure this has been posted before but I can not find it.
I have used a file to check witch files a .inf file shall use. This
util was very good to have when making a printers.def file.
My problem is that I can not find the file anymore and I do not know the
name of it.
Thanks,
/Mikael
2016 Apr 03
3
PA-RISC (hppa) video cards init failure loading the device driver kernel module
...ory at exit: 0 kiB
[ 48.612000] [TTM] Zone dma32: Used memory at exit: 0 kiB
[ 48.676000] [drm] radeon: ttm finalized
[ 48.724000] [drm] Forcing AGP to PCI mode
Starting File System Check on /d[ 48.872000] [drm]
Generation 2 PCI interface, using max accessible memory
ev/...2-638b-4a0[ 48.968000] radeon 0000:80:00.0: VRAM: 128M
0xFFFFFFFFC0000000 - 0xFFFFFFFFC7FFFFFF (128M used)
c-be55-7444e126d[ 49.088000] radeon 0000:80:00.0: GTT: 512M
0xFFFFFFFFA0000000 - 0xFFFFFFFFBFFFFFFF
283...
[ 49.196000] [drm] Detected VRAM RAM=128M, BAR=128M
[ 49.264000] [drm] RAM width 128bits...
2016 Apr 04
1
PA-RISC (hppa) video cards init failure loading the device driver kernel module
...dma32: Used memory at exit: 0 kiB
>> [ 48.676000] [drm] radeon: ttm finalized
>> [ 48.724000] [drm] Forcing AGP to PCI mode
>> Starting File System Check on /d[ 48.872000] [drm]
>> Generation 2 PCI interface, using max accessible memory
>> ev/...2-638b-4a0[ 48.968000] radeon 0000:80:00.0: VRAM: 128M
>> 0xFFFFFFFFC0000000 - 0xFFFFFFFFC7FFFFFF (128M used)
>> c-be55-7444e126d[ 49.088000] radeon 0000:80:00.0: GTT: 512M
>> 0xFFFFFFFFA0000000 - 0xFFFFFFFFBFFFFFFF
>> 283...
>> [ 49.196000] [drm] Detected VRAM RAM=128M, BA...
2016 Apr 04
0
PA-RISC (hppa) video cards init failure loading the device driver kernel module
....612000] [TTM] Zone dma32: Used memory at exit: 0 kiB
> [ 48.676000] [drm] radeon: ttm finalized
> [ 48.724000] [drm] Forcing AGP to PCI mode
> Starting File System Check on /d[ 48.872000] [drm]
> Generation 2 PCI interface, using max accessible memory
> ev/...2-638b-4a0[ 48.968000] radeon 0000:80:00.0: VRAM: 128M
> 0xFFFFFFFFC0000000 - 0xFFFFFFFFC7FFFFFF (128M used)
> c-be55-7444e126d[ 49.088000] radeon 0000:80:00.0: GTT: 512M
> 0xFFFFFFFFA0000000 - 0xFFFFFFFFBFFFFFFF
> 283...
> [ 49.196000] [drm] Detected VRAM RAM=128M, BAR=128M
> [ 49.2...
2016 Apr 04
0
[Radeon] PA-RISC (hppa) video cards init failure loading the device driver kernel module
...at exit: 0 kiB
>>> [ 48.676000] [drm] radeon: ttm finalized
>>> [ 48.724000] [drm] Forcing AGP to PCI mode
>>> Starting File System Check on /d[ 48.872000] [drm]
>>> Generation 2 PCI interface, using max accessible memory
>>> ev/...2-638b-4a0[ 48.968000] radeon 0000:80:00.0: VRAM: 128M
>>> 0xFFFFFFFFC0000000 - 0xFFFFFFFFC7FFFFFF (128M used)
>>> c-be55-7444e126d[ 49.088000] radeon 0000:80:00.0: GTT: 512M
>>> 0xFFFFFFFFA0000000 - 0xFFFFFFFFBFFFFFFF
>>> 283...
>>> [ 49.196000] [drm] Detect...
2009 Apr 21
0
Unable to browse Samba share by hostname from certain clients...
...F AD 19 58 59 27 C7 2F BE 96 F0 53 02 B0 .\...XY' ./...S..
[470] D0 1B 21 90 AA BE 9E 2F DD 61 05 D7 DD B6 D4 C7 ..!..../ .a......
[480] 1A 7D B1 96 77 AA 12 13 4B 58 76 96 E2 98 5B 19 .}..w... KXv...[.
[490] A2 17 4A 78 4F E0 27 F4 31 B9 E7 49 8F 4F FE CD ..JxO.'. 1..I.O..
[4A0] E8 14 C3 0A F6 4C 91 DB BE A6 7C C1 E4 B2 E3 BE .....L.. ..|.....
[4B0] 32 71 B4 ED B5 7B 05 61 75 D8 47 E7 F9 2E B7 05 2q...{.a u.G.....
[4C0] 23 3D DA 24 C1 76 D6 68 9D 4A 0F F8 BF 41 4D DD #=.$.v.h .J...AM.
[4D0] D7 E0 A4 81 E8 30 81 E5 A0 03 02 01 17 A2 81 DD .....0.. ...........
2000 Aug 16
1
samba errormessages
...460] 03 FF 05 E1 0C FF 01 00 06 20 CC 10 08 0D 34 04 ........ .
....4.
[470] 44 01 56 16 86 10 D6 06 E6 10 27 05 77 00 97 15 D.V.....
..'.w...
[480] C7 04 E9 10 1B 01 EC 10 08 0F 44 17 06 03 36 00 ........
..D...6.
[490] 66 00 86 11 C6 14 17 02 98 12 F8 04 0B 01 1B 00 f.......
........
[4A0] 7B 00 AB 11 EB 01 5C 10 08 10 B4 17 06 04 16 01 {.....\.
........
[4B0] 46 30 A6 00 D6 00 37 10 77 14 F7 04 49 03 59 10 F0....7.
w...I.Y.
[4C0] 3A 01 EB 00 5C 10 8C 10 CC 10 08 0B 64 18 06 06 :...\...
....d...
[4D0] 16 20 96 10 37 10 87 00 A7 15 E9 10 3B 01 4B 00 . ..7...
....;.K.
[4E0] 1C...
2001 Jan 25
3
Samba quota 'feature' fix?
Hey Guys and Gals,
I'm wondering if the quotas.c file is supposed to fix the problem where a
Linux x86 system running with the quota software causes corrupt files to be
written by Windows clients. I compiled it in and it didn't seem to make a
difference for the following problem.
In other words, if I enable quotas on my RH6.2 / 2.2.16-22 kernel box and
then write a file via Samba/Windows
2007 Apr 30
0
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
...5 63 jne 501 <__FUNCTION__.22032+0x1>
> - 49e: 74 5f je 4ff <__FUNCTION__.21966+0x1f>
> + 49c: 75 63 jne 501 <__FUNCTION__.21945+0x1>
> + 49e: 74 5f je 4ff <__FUNCTION__.21879+0x1f>
> 4a0: 70 00 jo 4a2 <.str4>
>
> 000004a2 <.str4>:
> @@ -11799,61 +11799,61 @@
> 4bd: 50 push %eax
> ...
>
> -000004bf <__FUNCTION__.21932>:
> +000004bf <__FUNCTION__.21845>:
> 4bf: 64 65 63 6c 5f 66 arp...
2002 Sep 05
0
Printing to a windows printer (ERRSRV 22)
.....
[460] 1F 00 F8 6D C1 01 00 F8 63 C0 01 F8 65 B1 FB 0E
...m.... c...e...
[470] 01 FF 80 82 00 82 00 CD 00 03 03 FE 00 00 C1 20
........ .......
[480] 00 F8 6D C1 01 00 F8 63 C0 01 F8 65 B1 FB 0E 01
..m....c ...e....
[490] FF 80 82 00 82 00 CD 00 03 03 FE 00 00 C1 21 00
........ ......!.
[4A0] F8 6D C1 01 00 F8 63 C0 01 F8 65 B1 FB 0E 01 FF
.m....c. ..e.....
[4B0] 80 82 00 82 00 CD 00 03 03 FE 00 00 C1 22 00 F8
........ ....."..
[4C0] 6D C1 01 00 F8 63 C0 01 F8 65 B1 FB 0E 01 FF 80
m....c.. .e......
[4D0] 82 00 82 00 CD 00 03 03 FE 00 00 C1 23 00 F8 6D
........ ....#..m
[4E...
2007 Apr 27
2
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
The saga continues.
I've been tracking the interface changes and merging them with
the refactoring work I'm doing. I got as far as building stage3
of llvm-gcc but the object files from stage2 and stage3 differ:
warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs
warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs
(Are the above two ok?)
The list below is clearly bad. I think it's every object file in
the