Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "49e369d9".
Did you mean:
49436d9
2014 Sep 01
2
[LLVMdev] Bug 16257 - fmul of undef ConstantExpr not folded to undef
Hi Oleg,
On 01/09/14 15:42, Oleg Ranevskyy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for your comment, Owen.
> My LLVM expertise is certainly not enough to make such decisions yet.
> Duncan, do you have any comments on this or do you know anyone else who can
> decide about preserving NaN payloads?
my take is that the first thing to do is to see what the IEEE standard says
about NaNs.