Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "49d93764".
Did you mean:
491937694
2016 May 31
0
[RFC] Changing `lit` default output
...;t tell from the log why the
> common failed.
>
> Please let me know if you have any objections to the new format.
>
> - Daniel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160531/49d93764/attachment.html>
2016 May 31
4
[RFC] Changing `lit` default output
Hi all,
I have some patches up in:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D20721
to make `lit` output more readable when commands fail. I'd like to get a
little more feedback on this before landing, since it impacts how test
failures appear when using the internal shell script runner (which is not
the default so this will currently mostly impact Windows or test frameworks
that intentionally set this