Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "49962cbc".
2014 Jan 09
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] AArch64 Clang CLI interface proposal
I think that this works (and adds no appreciable driver complexity) provided
that we're not expecting to support -mtune. If clang is (one day) going to
be able to isel based on one target and optimize based on another then we
might find ourselves wanting to change the meaning of -march from 'isel and
optimize' to 'isel only'. So Amara's question about -mtune (or more
2014 Jan 27
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] AArch64 Clang CLI interface proposal
Ping. Can I assume that we're ok with this interface proposal then?
Amara
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140127/49962cbc/attachment.html>