Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "497gb".
Did you mean:
47gb
2015 Feb 18
0
CentOS 7: software RAID 5 array with 4 disks and no spares?
...nsidering
downsizing that to 250G, or maybe 150G) and the rest in another partition
for users' data and programs. The installer absolutely does *not* want to
do what we want. We want swap - 2G - as the *second* partition. But if we
use the installer, as soon as we create the third partition, of 497GB, for
/, it immediately reorders them, so that / is second.
Duh....
The result is that we get to the screen to choose the drive, and say
"custom partition"... then <alt-F2>, and use parted to make the
partitions, then go back to the GUI and just assign the mount points and
filesyst...
2015 Feb 19
2
CentOS 7: software RAID 5 array with 4 disks and no spares?
...izing that to 250G, or maybe 150G) and the rest in another partition
> for users' data and programs. The installer absolutely does *not* want to
> do what we want. We want swap - 2G - as the *second* partition. But if we
> use the installer, as soon as we create the third partition, of 497GB, for
> /, it immediately reorders them, so that / is second.
I'm open to having my mind changed on this, but I'm not actually
understanding why it needs to be in the 2nd slot, other than you want
it there, which actually isn't a good enough reason. If there's a good
reason for i...
2015 Feb 18
4
CentOS 7: software RAID 5 array with 4 disks and no spares?
Le 18/02/2015 23:12, Chris Murphy a ?crit :
> What is NOT obvious: for single device installs, if you omit the size
> in the create mount point dialog, the size of the resulting volume
> will consume all remaining space. But since there's no way to preset
> raid5 at the time a mount point is created (raid5 is set after the
> fact), there isn't a clear way to say "use
2015 Feb 19
0
CentOS 7: software RAID 5 array with 4 disks and no spares?
...o 250G, or maybe 150G) and the rest in another partition
>> for users' data and programs. The installer absolutely does *not* want to
>> do what we want. We want swap - 2G - as the *second* partition. But if we
>> use the installer, as soon as we create the third partition, of 497GB, for
>> /, it immediately reorders them, so that / is second.
>
> I'm open to having my mind changed on this, but I'm not actually
> understanding why it needs to be in the 2nd slot, other than you want
> it there, which actually isn't a good enough reason. If there...