Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "4921662f".
2011 Oct 13
1
[LLVMdev] VirtRegRewriter.cpp: LocalRewriter::ProcessUses()
...rand() doesn't append the operand to the end? It really should.
Also note that MI.addOperand() was mostly rewritten in r140744.
/jakob
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20111013/4921662f/attachment.html>
2011 Oct 12
0
[LLVMdev] VirtRegRewriter.cpp: LocalRewriter::ProcessUses()
On Oct 7, 2011, at 8:14 AM, Jonas Paulsson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think I've found a bug in this method.
>
> I ran it on an MI which already had two implicit-use operands, and which defined a register with a subregindex, ie reg::lo16.
>
> For the def-operand, with a subregindex, an implicit-use operand was added with this code:
>
>
2011 Oct 07
3
[LLVMdev] VirtRegRewriter.cpp: LocalRewriter::ProcessUses()
Hi,
I think I've found a bug in this method.
I ran it on an MI which already had two implicit-use operands, and which defined a register with a subregindex, ie reg::lo16.
For the def-operand, with a subregindex, an implicit-use operand was added with this code:
VirtUseOps.insert(VirtUseOps.begin(), MI.getNumOperands());
MI.addOperand(MachineOperand::CreateReg(VirtReg,