search for: 48e94f4fa

Hi, Martin Str|mberg wrote: > Given David's last report the part: > - jmp 1f > + jmp 2f > 1: > + xor %cx, %cx /* Clear EBIOS flag. */ > +2: > > can be ignored. His BIOS isn't corrputing CX (which I > thought). However that part doesn't hurt if it remains. I think it still has good reason to exist. The test cmpw

...actly are you referring to with "as is"? Should the whole patch be applied? Or only the first part of the patch should be applied while the second part should be skipped, leaving the second section of the code as it used to be during the last few years? After reverting the last commit 48e94f4fa... (the one with the wrong patch, the one that triggered Geert's question), perhaps there should be 2 separate commits applying the 2 sections of the last valid patch separately? Regards, Ady.