search for: 48d

...S:%vreg5 Joined. Result = %R25R24,inf = [0L,96d:0) 0 at 0L-phidef 32L %vreg5<def> = COPY %R25R24; PTRREGS:%vreg5 Not coalescable. 64L %vreg6<def> = COPY %vreg4<kill>; DLDREGS:%vreg6,%vreg4 Considering merging %vreg4 with %vreg6 to DLDREGS RHS = %vreg4 = [48d,64d:0) 0 at 48d LHS = %vreg6 = [64d,80d:1)[80d,112d:0) 0 at 80d 1 at 64d updated: 48L %vreg6<def> = LDWRd %vreg5<kill>; mem:LD2[%a](align=1)(tbaa=!"int") DLDREGS:%vreg6 PTRREGS:%vreg5 Joined. Result = %vreg6 = [48d,80d:1)[80d,112d:0) 0 at 80d 1 at 48d...

...lt = %R25R24,inf = [0L,96d:0) 0 at 0L-phidef > 32L %vreg5<def> = COPY %R25R24; PTRREGS:%vreg5 > Not coalescable. > 64L %vreg6<def> = COPY %vreg4<kill>; DLDREGS:%vreg6,%vreg4 > Considering merging %vreg4 with %vreg6 to DLDREGS > RHS = %vreg4 = [48d,64d:0) 0 at 48d > LHS = %vreg6 = [64d,80d:1)[80d,112d:0) 0 at 80d 1 at 64d > updated: 48L %vreg6<def> = LDWRd %vreg5<kill>; mem:LD2[%a](align=1)(tbaa=!"int") DLDREGS:%vreg6 PTRREGS:%vreg5 > Joined. Result = %vreg6 = [48d,80d:1)[80d,112d:0) 0...

On Mar 26, 2011, at 1:04 PM, Borja Ferrer wrote: > Hello Jakob, thanks for the reply. The three regclasses involved here are all subsets from each other and aren't disjoint. These are the basic descriptions of the regclasses involved to show what i mean: > > DREGS: R31R30, R29R28 down to R1R0 (16 regs) > DLDREGS: R31R30, R29R28 down to R17R16 (8 regs) > PTRREGS:

Hello Jakob, thanks for the reply. The three regclasses involved here are all subsets from each other and aren't disjoint. These are the basic descriptions of the regclasses involved to show what i mean: DREGS: R31R30, R29R28 down to R1R0 (16 regs) DLDREGS: R31R30, R29R28 down to R17R16 (8 regs) PTRREGS: R31R30, R29R28, R27R26 (3 regs) All classes intersect each other

..., OPTIONS, BYE, REFER Contact: <sip:1234@192.168.0.200> Proxy-Authenticate: Digest realm="asterisk", nonce="00727441" Content-Length: 0 to 192.168.0.202:5060 Sip read: REGISTER sip:192.168.0.200:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.202:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-413ef95b-48d-3dcc Max-Forwards: 70 Supported: replaces User-Agent: FXS_GW (4asipfxs.107a) Contact: <sip:1235@192.168.0.202:5060>;expires=60 From: <sip:1235@192.168.0.200> ;tag=c0a800ca-13c4-413ef95b-488-4bff To: <sip:1235@192.168.0.200> Call-ID: c0a800ca-13c4-0-334-1c34 CSeq: 2 REGISTER Conten...

Hi, I have a column of DOB in mm/dd/yyyy. I want to convert this format to age. Thanks a lot.   Best,Farnoosh Sheikhi [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...t 14 ip b7fd4a21 sp bfebab10 error 4 in lib20_expire_plugin.so[b7fd3000+2000] Dec 4 13:58:40 mail kernel: [1605650.013144] imap[16772]: segfault at 355 ip b7e41a1e sp bff27b80 error 4 in lib20_expire_plugin.so[b7e40000+2000] Dec 4 14:14:09 mail kernel: [1606578.801269] imap[15665]: segfault at 48d ip b7f3ca1e sp bfc22840 error 4 in lib20_expire_plugin.so[b7f3b000+2000] In changelog I see that there are updates for trash plugin going from v1.1.3 to v.1.1.4 Using v1.1.4 pre-build for Ubuntu server and lazy enough to do manual compilation... thanks for your time, Ivars

...3333, 1) exited non-zero on 'SIP/229.159.241.112:5 060' set_destination: Parsing for address/port to send t o set_destination: set destination to 188.208.12.37, port 5060 Reliably Transmitting: BYE sip:sip@188.208.12.37:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 188.208.12.237:5060;branch=z9hG4bK6723148d From: ;tag=as52ed0a6a To: ;tag=0-13c4-3a5246f7-8c6b604-c3a Contact: Call-ID: f93b00-0-13c4-3a5246f7-8c6b602-3765@188.208.12.37 CSeq: 102 BYE User-Agent: Asterisk PBX Content-Length: 0 (no NAT) to 188.208.12.37:5060 Sip read: SIP/2.0 200 OK From: To: ;tag=0-13c4-3a5246f7-8c6b604-c3a Call-ID: f93b...

I write the email again, the third time!!, cause the other two ones, I have had problems while sending them. I hope this time it works. Here is the email again: Hi (and sorry) everybody I'm starting with SIP and I wanted to ask some questions, perhaps silly ones, but I hope people can answer me! 1) Which codecs may I use? I want the SIP phones to call to the PSTN above all, but I have

...> > 488: 61 popa > 489: 6c insb (%dx),%es:(%edi) > 48a: 61 popa > - 48b: 72 5f jb 4ec <__FUNCTION__.21966+0xc> > + 48b: 72 5f jb 4ec <__FUNCTION__.21879+0xc> > 48d: 61 popa > 48e: 6e outsb %ds:(%esi),(%dx) > 48f: 64 fs > 490: 5f pop %edi > - 491: 76 61 jbe 4f4 <__FUNCTION__.21966+0x14> > - 493: 72 79 jb 50e <__FU...

The saga continues. I've been tracking the interface changes and merging them with the refactoring work I'm doing. I got as far as building stage3 of llvm-gcc but the object files from stage2 and stage3 differ: warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs (Are the above two ok?) The list below is clearly bad. I think it's every object file in the

Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking