Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "489g".
Did you mean:
489
2010 Mar 04
8
Huge difference in reporting disk usage via du and zfs list. Fragmentation?
Do we have enormous fragmentation here on our X4500 with Solaris 10, ZFS Version 10?
What except zfs send/receive can be done to free the fragmented space?
One ZFS was used for some month to store some large disk images (each 50GByte large) which are copied there with rsync. This ZFS then reports 6.39TByte usage with zfs list and only 2TByte usage with du.
The other ZFS was used for similar
2007 Apr 20
0
problem mounting one of the zfs file system during boot
...10 3.72G - 123G -
mypool/d at 2006_month_12 22.3G - 156G -
mypool/d at 2007_month_01 23.3G - 161G -
mypool/d at 2007_month_02 16.1G - 172G -
mypool/d at 2007_month_03 13.8G - 168G -
mypool/d at 2007_month_04 15.7G - 168G -
mypool2 489G 448G 52K /mypool2
mypool2/d3 171G 448G 171G legacy
Regards,
Chris
2007 Feb 27
16
understanding zfs/thunoer "bottlenecks"?
Currently I''m trying to figure out the best zfs layout for a thumper wrt. to read AND write performance.
I did some simple mkfile 512G tests and found out, that per average ~ 500 MB/s seems to be the maximum on can reach (tried initial default setup, all 46 HDDs as R0, etc.).
According to http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/ArchitectureWP_062806.pdf I would