Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "488f".
Did you mean:
488
2016 Sep 23
6
replPropertyMetaData & KCC issues after updating to Samba 4.5.0
...dd7ba36
Last attempt @ Fri Sep 23 14:42:34 2016 EDT was successful
0 consecutive failure(s).
Last success @ Fri Sep 23 14:42:34 2016 EDT
DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=domain,DC=local
site-c\DUNDC1 via RPC
DSA object GUID: a216e718-488f-4821-8d9c-a399e6789222
Last attempt @ Fri Sep 23 14:42:32 2016 EDT was successful
0 consecutive failure(s).
Last success @ Fri Sep 23 14:42:32 2016 EDT
DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=domain,DC=local
site-c\DUNDC2 via RPC
DSA object...
2016 Sep 24
0
replPropertyMetaData & KCC issues after updating to Samba 4.5.0
...tempt @ Fri Sep 23 14:42:34 2016 EDT was
> successful
> 0 consecutive failure(s).
> Last success @ Fri Sep 23 14:42:34 2016 EDT
>
> DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=domain,DC=local
> site-c\DUNDC1 via RPC
> DSA object GUID: a216e718-488f-4821-8d9c-a399e6789222
> Last attempt @ Fri Sep 23 14:42:32 2016 EDT was
> successful
> 0 consecutive failure(s).
> Last success @ Fri Sep 23 14:42:32 2016 EDT
>
> DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=domain,DC=local
> site-c\DUNDC2 via...
2016 Sep 22
2
replPropertyMetaData & KCC issues after updating to Samba 4.5.0
On 9/21/2016 11:32 PM, Garming Sam wrote:
> I would have assumed that deleting all the NTDS connections for all the
> DCs would have remedied this issue. I'll write a patch to try to avoid
> this error in any case.
>
> Ignoring this error and answering your earlier question, it's often hard
> to tell if the KCC is doing what is expected or not. To figure that out,
>
2016 Sep 24
0
updates of repsFrom/repsTo attributes (was : Re: replPropertyMetaData & KCC issues after updating to Samba 4.5.0)
Hi LingPanda101,
....
>
> DC=domain,DC=local
> site-c\DUNDC1 via RPC
> DSA object GUID: a216e718-488f-4821-8d9c-a399e6789222
> Last attempt @ NTTIME(0) was successful
> 0 consecutive failure(s).
> Last success @ NTTIME(0)
>
> DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=domain,DC=local
> site-c\DUNDC2 via RPC
> DSA object GUID: 3c...
2013 Oct 07
0
rails_admin problem in raoutes, parallel login area in devise
...n email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/0e874a12-4a83-488f-b983-682ad85c63c9%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
2014 Sep 15
0
[PATCH] virtio-pci: also bind to Amazon PCI vendor ID
...t of WHQL certification. My understanding is
> that Microsoft will only allow the owner of the PCI Vendor ID to WHQL
> drivers. As best as I know, this is not a publicly documented
> process.
WHQL process seems to be documented:
http://download.microsoft.com/download/4/D/D/4DD894CD-62C8-488F-944D-4E5F8BA40114/hardware-certification-policies-processes-hck2-1.docx
> Do you have any examples of anyone else successfuling WHQL'ing drivers
> by just changing the subsystem ID?
I don't have such examples to hand, sorry.
I do think it's worth trying as I don't see any pro...
2014 Sep 15
3
[PATCH] virtio-pci: also bind to Amazon PCI vendor ID
Hi Michael,
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 08:29:33PM -0700, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori at amazon.com>
>>
>> See https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/VIRTIO-16 although it
>> was prematurely closed.
>
> The reason it was closed is described in the
2014 Sep 15
3
[PATCH] virtio-pci: also bind to Amazon PCI vendor ID
Hi Michael,
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 08:29:33PM -0700, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori at amazon.com>
>>
>> See https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/VIRTIO-16 although it
>> was prematurely closed.
>
> The reason it was closed is described in the