Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "48703".
Did you mean:
4870
2009 Jun 03
2
reference counting bug related to break and next in loops
One of our R users here just showed me the following problem while
investigating the return value of a while loop. I added some
information
on a similar bug in for loops. I think he was using 2.9.0
but I see the same problem on today's development version of 2.10.0
(svn 48703).
Should the semantics of while and for loops be changed slightly to avoid
the memory
buildup that fixing this to reflect the current docs would entail? S+'s
loops return nothing useful - that change was made long ago to avoid
memory buildup resulting from semantics akin the R's present s...