search for: 48410

...ies of data. The folloqing is my data matrix of n > n 25p 5p 2.5p 0.5p 16B-E06.g 45379 4383 5123 45 16B-E06.g 45138 4028 6249 52 16B-E06.g 48457 4267 5470 54 16B-E06.g 47740 4676 6769 48 37B-B02.g 42860 6152 19276 72 35B-A02.g 48325 12863 38274 143 35B-A02.g 48410 12806 39013 175 35B-A02.g 48417 9057 40923 176 35B-A02.g 51403 13865 43338 161 45B-C12.g 50939 3656 5783 43 45B-C12.g 52356 5524 6041 55 45B-C12.g 49338 5141 5266 41 45B-C12.g 51567 3915 5677 43 35A-G04.g 40365 5513 6971 32 35B-D01.g 54217 12607 13067 93 35B-D01.g 55283 11...

Hello everyone, I would really like to get wireless working on my CentOS 5.1 install. I have a LinkSys WPC54G (I guess version 1 since no version is listed) but everything I've read indicates that this would be a nightmare for a Linux newbie like myself. I got as far as NDISWrapper, but right off the bat I am getting issues with KBuild and I guess my kernel source so I can't even get

Real networks use either PREC (as it maps 1:1 to 802.1p and MPLS TC) or DSCP. Interactive SSH uses PREC 0x0, which is just best-effort and DSCP 0x4 which has no standard meaning (found network where DSCP 0x4 was dropped, completely, as it didn't hit any defined/allowed QoS class, obviously misconfig, BE class should eat anything not already defined) Should interactive use TOS value which has

...alin -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110212/cca03650/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: llbrowse2.png Type: image/png Size: 48410 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110212/cca03650/attachment.png>

On Feb 12, 2011, at 10:28 AM, Talin wrote: > On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 6:40 AM, Garrison Venn <gvenn.cfe.dev at gmail.com> wrote: > Looks cool Talin. > > Personally it would be nice if it was checked into llvm.org, but is wxWidgets LGPL like license > an issue for llvm's repository? > > There should be no problem with the license. wxWidgets is indeed distributed

On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 6:40 AM, Garrison Venn <gvenn.cfe.dev at gmail.com>wrote: > Looks cool Talin. > > Personally it would be nice if it was checked into llvm.org, but is > wxWidgets LGPL like license > an issue for llvm's repository? > There should be no problem with the license. wxWidgets is indeed distributed under a modified version of the LGPL (with a special