Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "47c22e7d".
2013 Oct 23
0
[LLVMdev] First attempt at recognizing pointer reduction
On Oct 23, 2013, at 9:41 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:
> On 21 October 2013 17:29, Arnold Schwaighofer <aschwaighofer at apple.com> wrote:
> I don’t think that recognizing this as a reduction is going to get you far. A reduction is beneficial if the value reduced is only truly needed outside of a loop.
> This is not the case here (we are storing/loading
2013 Oct 23
2
[LLVMdev] First attempt at recognizing pointer reduction
On 21 October 2013 17:29, Arnold Schwaighofer <aschwaighofer at apple.com>wrote:
> I don’t think that recognizing this as a reduction is going to get you
> far. A reduction is beneficial if the value reduced is only truly needed
> outside of a loop.
> This is not the case here (we are storing/loading from the pointer).
>
Hi Arnold, Nadav,
Let me resurrect this discussion a
2013 Oct 23
2
[LLVMdev] First attempt at recognizing pointer reduction
...e. But at some time, I'll have to
either identify the memory PHIs or transform the loop to avoid them at all.
Does that make sense?
cheers,
--renato
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131023/47c22e7d/attachment.html>