search for: 474,9

...long ecx; + unsigned long edx; +}; + +static struct xarray sev_es_cpuid_cache; +static bool __ro_after_init sev_es_cpuid_cache_initialized; + /* For early boot hypervisor communication in SEV-ES enabled guests */ static struct ghcb boot_ghcb_page __bss_decrypted __aligned(PAGE_SIZE); @@ -463,6 +474,9 @@ void __init sev_es_init_vc_handling(void) sev_es_setup_vc_stack(cpu); } + xa_init_flags(&sev_es_cpuid_cache, XA_FLAGS_LOCK_IRQ); + sev_es_cpuid_cache_initialized = true; + init_vc_stack_names(); } @@ -744,6 +758,91 @@ static enum es_result vc_handle_mmio(struct ghcb *ghcb, re...

...+ > +static struct xarray sev_es_cpuid_cache; > +static bool __ro_after_init sev_es_cpuid_cache_initialized; > + > /* For early boot hypervisor communication in SEV-ES enabled guests */ > static struct ghcb boot_ghcb_page __bss_decrypted __aligned(PAGE_SIZE); > > @@ -463,6 +474,9 @@ void __init sev_es_init_vc_handling(void) > sev_es_setup_vc_stack(cpu); > } > > + xa_init_flags(&sev_es_cpuid_cache, XA_FLAGS_LOCK_IRQ); > + sev_es_cpuid_cache_initialized = true; > + > init_vc_stack_names(); > } > > @@ -744,6 +758,91 @@ static enu...

...+ > +static struct xarray sev_es_cpuid_cache; > +static bool __ro_after_init sev_es_cpuid_cache_initialized; > + > /* For early boot hypervisor communication in SEV-ES enabled guests */ > static struct ghcb boot_ghcb_page __bss_decrypted __aligned(PAGE_SIZE); > > @@ -463,6 +474,9 @@ void __init sev_es_init_vc_handling(void) > sev_es_setup_vc_stack(cpu); > } > > + xa_init_flags(&sev_es_cpuid_cache, XA_FLAGS_LOCK_IRQ); > + sev_es_cpuid_cache_initialized = true; > + > init_vc_stack_names(); > } > > @@ -744,6 +758,91 @@ static enu...

...##func) + +/** + * DEFINE_IDTENTRY_VC - Emit code for VMM communication handler + * @func: Function name of the entry point + * + * Maps to DEFINE_IDTENTRY_RAW_ERRORCODE + */ +#define DEFINE_IDTENTRY_VC(func) \ + DEFINE_IDTENTRY_RAW_ERRORCODE(func) + #else /* CONFIG_X86_64 */ /** @@ -433,6 +474,9 @@ __visible noinstr void func(struct pt_regs *regs, \ # define DECLARE_IDTENTRY_XENCB(vector, func) \ DECLARE_IDTENTRY(vector, func) +# define DECLARE_IDTENTRY_VC(vector, func) \ + idtentry_vc vector asm_##func func + #else # define DECLARE_IDTENTRY_MCE(vector, func) \ DECLAR...

...st_error; /* Last error on handle. */ - int last_errnum; /* errno, or 0 if there was no errno */ - /* Temporary and cache directories. */ /* The actual temporary directory - this is not created with the * handle, you have to call guestfs_int_lazy_make_tmpdir. @@ -474,9 +463,13 @@ struct guestfs_h { char *int_cachedir; /* $LIBGUESTFS_CACHEDIR or guestfs_set_cachedir or NULL */ /* Error handler, plus stack of old error handlers. */ - guestfs_error_handler_cb error_cb; - void * error_cb_data; - struct error_cb_stack *error_cb_s...

...+{ + if (transport_g2h && cid == transport_g2h->get_local_cid()) + return true; + + if (transport_h2g && cid == VMADDR_CID_HOST) + return true; + + return false; +} + static struct sock *vsock_dequeue_accept(struct sock *listener) { struct vsock_sock *vlistener; @@ -414,6 +474,9 @@ static int vsock_send_shutdown(struct sock *sk, int mode) { struct vsock_sock *vsk = vsock_sk(sk); + if (!vsk->transport) + return -ENODEV; + return vsk->transport->shutdown(vsk, mode); } @@ -530,7 +593,6 @@ static int __vsock_bind_dgram(struct vsock_sock *vsk, static int...

...converters[entry->type].write) - g_value_take_string (value, converters[entry->type].write (entry->value)); + if (converters[entry->type].to_string) + g_value_take_string (value, converters[entry->type].to_string (entry->value)); return; default: break; @@ -474,9 +474,9 @@ swfedit_token_set (SwfeditToken *token, token = iter->user_data; i = GPOINTER_TO_UINT (iter->user_data2); entry = &g_array_index (token->tokens, Entry, i); - if (converters[entry->type].read == NULL) + if (converters[entry->type].from_string == NULL)...

Previously posted in 2015: v1: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2015-June/msg00048.html v2: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2015-June/msg00118.html I have rebased and tidied up the patches, fixing a few spelling mistakes, but they are broadly the same as before. I also ran all the tests, which pass. As with the previous versions, this makes a change to the API, where you

The vsock_diag.ko module already has a test suite but the core AF_VSOCK functionality has no tests. This patch series adds several test cases that exercise AF_VSOCK SOCK_STREAM socket semantics (send/recv, connect/accept, half-closed connections, simultaneous connections). Stefan: Do you think we should have a single application or is better to split it in single tests (e.g.

The vsock_diag.ko module already has a test suite but the core AF_VSOCK functionality has no tests. This patch series adds several test cases that exercise AF_VSOCK SOCK_STREAM socket semantics (send/recv, connect/accept, half-closed connections, simultaneous connections). The v1 of this series was originally sent by Stefan. v3: - Patch 6: * check the byte received in the recv_byte() * use

Hi, here is the next version of changes to enable Linux to run as an SEV-ES guest. The code was rebased to v5.7-rc3 and got a fair number of changes since the last version. What is SEV-ES ============== SEV-ES is an acronym for 'Secure Encrypted Virtualization - Encrypted State' and means a hardware feature of AMD processors which hides the register state of VCPUs to the hypervisor by

Hi, here is the next version of changes to enable Linux to run as an SEV-ES guest. The code was rebased to v5.7-rc3 and got a fair number of changes since the last version. What is SEV-ES ============== SEV-ES is an acronym for 'Secure Encrypted Virtualization - Encrypted State' and means a hardware feature of AMD processors which hides the register state of VCPUs to the hypervisor by

This series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use VSOCK with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using VMware

This series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use VSOCK with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using VMware

...en)) { + SWFDEC_ERROR ("GotoLabel action does not specify a string"); + return NULL; + } + + return g_strdup_printf ("GotoLabel %s", data); +} + +static char * swfdec_action_print_wait_for_frame (guint action, const guint8 *data, guint len) { guint frame, jump; @@ -1474,8 +1635,8 @@ typedef struct { static const SwfdecActionSpec actions[256] = { /* version 3 */ - [0x04] = { "NextFrame", NULL }, - [0x05] = { "PreviousFrame", NULL }, + [0x04] = { "NextFrame", NULL, 0, 0, { swfdec_action_next_frame, swfdec_action_next_frame, swf...

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Hi, here is the new version of the SEV-ES client enabling patch-set. It is based on the latest tip/master branch and contains the necessary changes. In particular those ar: - Enabling CR4.FSGSBASE early on supported processors so that early #VC exceptions on APs can be handled. - Add another patch (patch 1) to fix a KVM frame-size build

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Hi, here is a new version of the SEV-ES Guest Support patches for x86. The previous versions can be found as a linked list starting here: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200824085511.7553-1-joro at 8bytes.org/ I updated the patch-set based on ther review comments I got and the discussions around it. Another important change is that the early IDT

From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> Hi, here is a new version of the SEV-ES Guest Support patches for x86. The previous versions can be found as a linked list starting here: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200824085511.7553-1-joro at 8bytes.org/ I updated the patch-set based on ther review comments I got and the discussions around it. Another important change is that the early IDT