search for: 472m

...12332632k total, 9498568k used, 2834064k free, 175476k buffers Swap: 25624568k total, 40148k used, 25584420k free, 8393700k cached PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 1565 root 20 0 517m 115m 54m S 8.6 1.0 8:11.76 samba 1553 root 20 0 472m 16m 6968 S 0.3 0.1 0:19.81 samba Does anybody know what can be done? Is this normal? How can I check what these huge processes do? Thanks everyone. -- Luk Tomaszew

...   2% /run /dev/mapper/RT--vg-root           51G   21G   28G  42% / tmpfs                            3.9G     0  3.9G   0% /dev/shm tmpfs                            5.0M     0  5.0M   0% /run/lock tmpfs                            3.9G     0  3.9G   0% /sys/fs/cgroup /dev/vda1                        472M  155M  293M  35% /boot 192.168.0.16:/volume1/fileLevel  8.1T  2.5T  5.6T  31% /mnt/nfs/fileLevel tmpfs                            789M     0  789M   0% /run/user/1000 I would prefer to not get caught out again with this machine pausing, how can I determine how much space is being used up by '...

...chunk_size: 128M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 40M gran_size: 32M chunk_size: 256M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: 40M *BAD*gran_size: 32M chunk_size: 512M num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -216M *BAD*gran_size: 32M chunk_size: 1G num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -472M *BAD*gran_size: 32M chunk_size: 2G num_reg: 10 lose cover RAM: -472M gran_size: 64M chunk_size: 64M num_reg: 8 lose cover RAM: 104M gran_size: 64M chunk_size: 128M num_reg: 8 lose cover RAM: 104M gran_size: 64M chunk_size: 256M num_reg: 9 lose...

I have been using internal snapshots on production qcow2 images for a couple of years, admittedly as infrequently as possible with one exception and that exception has had multiple snapshots taken and removed using virt-manager's GUI. I was unaware of this: > There are some technical downsides to > internal snapshots IIUC, such as inability to free the space used by the > internal