Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "470d541f".
Did you mean:
440541f
2008 Dec 28
0
[LLVMdev] [Patch] Adding unit tests to LLVM
>> ...snip...
>
> Also for a note of reference, your links to the examples are the
> most advanced samples. So boost can do more, thus has more weight/
> bloat behind it.
>
> Were the other test kits looked at? Is gtest the best solution for
> the project.
>
> Is this something your planning as putting in the tree, thus require
> pulling in changes from
2008 Dec 28
2
[LLVMdev] [Patch] Adding unit tests to LLVM
...ing), but Visual Studio 2008 has a free
add-on pack to add TR1 support:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/visualc/default.aspx (see the downloads
section).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20081227/470d541f/attachment.html>
2008 Dec 28
3
[LLVMdev] [Patch] Adding unit tests to LLVM
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Mark Kromis <greybird at mac.com> wrote:
>
> On Dec 27, 2008, at 7:41 PM, Misha Brukman wrote:
>
> 2008/12/27 Mark Kromis <greybird at mac.com>
>
>> Just a curiosity question, why push for gtest vs Boost Test or
>> a different test suite?
>> I normally use Boost, and their test suite, so I'm more familiar with